Page 11 of 79 FirstFirst ... 9 10 11 12 13 21 61 ... LastLast
Results 301 to 330 of 2386

Thread: Trump 2018 - Trump Foundation ordered to dissolve, Flynn Sentencing Delayed

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    W/A
    Posts
    8,246
    Mentioned
    233 Post(s)
    What I don't get is if they like Europe so much, why don't they go back? I mean isn't that the argument used on black people usually? "Go back home", by which they mean go back to Africa?

    Can we tell them to go back to Europe?
    Train carrying GOP lawmakers to policy retreat hits truck; 1 dead

    Associated Press on MSN.com · 39m

    No lawmakers were seriously injured Wednesday when their Amtrak train collided with a garbage truck near Charlottesville, Virginia.
    It's terrible that the individual died, but is there a better karmic example of the GOP this past year?
    Last edited by allegate; 01-31-2018 at 01:27 PM.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Monterey Bay, Ca
    Posts
    3,137
    Mentioned
    61 Post(s)
    This whole memo thing is a case and point. They spend a year discrediting the FBI and two leaked dossiers but hey somehow THIS one is valid. Fuck all of these people

  3. #3
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Posts
    235
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Wretchedest View Post
    This whole memo thing is a case and point. They spend a year discrediting the FBI and two leaked dossiers but hey somehow THIS one is valid. Fuck all of these people
    It makes you question what the republicans lost first, their minds or their morality? (cue R.E.M.'s Losing My Religion)

    But I guess its the chicken and the egg.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    the beginning of the end
    Posts
    9,369
    Mentioned
    734 Post(s)
    Hahahahaha, Trump (falsely) claimed that his SOTU address was the most watched SOTU address in american history because OF COURSE he did.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Laughingstock of the World (America)
    Posts
    4,579
    Mentioned
    104 Post(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by elevenism View Post
    Hahahahaha, Trump (falsely) claimed that his SOTU address was the most watched SOTU address in american history because OF COURSE he did.
    I think the numbers fell right where I expected. On one hand, I'm sure you had a lot of first-time viewers who wanted to see their Golden God yell and scream about everyone who isn't white like them. On the other hand, I'm sure a lot of people who would normally watch made it a point to not tune in and listen to that arrogant blowhard spew up whatever BS was written for him. Gain some, lose some, and your numbers come out average.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Posts
    235
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)




    President Turd

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Laughingstock of the World (America)
    Posts
    4,579
    Mentioned
    104 Post(s)
    http://docs.house.gov/meetings/IG/IG...0129-SD001.pdf

    I don't have the time, patience, or intestinal fortitude to read it just yet, but hopefully sometime soon. Anyway, that's the direct link to the memo (memo itself starts on page 3)

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Montreal, QC
    Posts
    2,649
    Mentioned
    101 Post(s)
    Good analysis of the memo by Politico.

    https://www.politico.com/interactive...ased-analysis/

  9. #9
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Posts
    235
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Groudhog Day during the Trump administration..........



  10. #10
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Laughingstock of the World (America)
    Posts
    4,579
    Mentioned
    104 Post(s)


    Goddamnit, Daily Show. I love you.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Posts
    235
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    This is kind of a question for allegro. I was watching MSNBC they were talking about the Mueller investigation, they were implying that Mueller has enough to indict a sitting president on obstruction of justice and collusion with a foreign government. They also mentioned that the possibility is there that the republican party would most likely try to obstruct the indictment for Trump.
    My question is this, if Mueller has enough to indict a sitting president will we still have to wait for the blue wave in the November 2018 election, for the democrats to get the majority of both senate and congress to move forward with the inditement?

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Highland Park, IL
    Posts
    14,384
    Mentioned
    994 Post(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Sister Midnight View Post
    This is kind of a question for allegro. I was watching MSNBC they were talking about the Mueller investigation, they were implying that Mueller has enough to indict a sitting president on obstruction of justice and collusion with a foreign government. They also mentioned that the possibility is there that the republican party would most likely try to obstruct the indictment for Trump.
    My question is this, if Mueller has enough to indict a sitting president will we still have to wait for the blue wave in the November 2018 election, for the democrats to get the majority of both senate and congress to move forward with the inditement?
    No idea.

    See this: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/...=.ba78d81cb2e8

    Everything I’ve seen indicates that Mueller won’t indict Trump but will instead submit a report to Rosenstein and leave that decision up to him, and Rosenstein would likely leave it up to a grand jury. But there are still questions as to whether or not a sitting President can be indicted. Re Impeachment, that would likely have to wait for a blue wave. There’s a difference between a Federal indictment re something like money laundering vs. impeachment (which is basically criminal indictment of a President) re obstruction of justice.

    Maybe. This is really complicated shit.

    https://mobile.nytimes.com/2017/12/0...ww.google.com/
    Last edited by allegro; 02-05-2018 at 01:43 AM.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Posts
    235
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by allegro View Post
    No idea.

    See this: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/...=.ba78d81cb2e8

    Everything I’ve seen indicates that Mueller won’t indict Trump but will instead submit a report to Rosenstein and leave that decision up to him, and Rosenstein would likely leave it up to a grand jury. But there are still questions as to whether or not a sitting President can be indicted. Re Impeachment, that would likely have to wait for a blue wave. There’s a difference between a Federal indictment re something like money laundering vs. impeachment (which is basically criminal indictment of a President) re obstruction of justice.

    Maybe. This is really complicated shit.

    https://mobile.nytimes.com/2017/12/0...ww.google.com/
    Thanks for your answer. I'm starting to believe that the blue wave is the only way to get Trump removed from office. This is insane all the legal channels and all the possible ways Trump can slither out of this. Trump has already shown that he is pretty much teflon, with all the legal possibilities for Trump to evade justice.

    Another interesting thought I had is, what if Mike Pence is mentioned as a conspirator, is it possible to impeach him and Trump, and if the democrats take the house in November Paul Ryan won't be speaker of the house anymore.

    Even with the Mueller investigation, it seems that those of us who do not like Trump and believe he is criminally sitting in the white house, our only hope really is the November mid term election.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    9,239
    Mentioned
    553 Post(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Sister Midnight View Post
    This is kind of a question for allegro. I was watching MSNBC they were talking about the Mueller investigation, they were implying that Mueller has enough to indict a sitting president on obstruction of justice and collusion with a foreign government. They also mentioned that the possibility is there that the republican party would most likely try to obstruct the indictment for Trump.
    My question is this, if Mueller has enough to indict a sitting president will we still have to wait for the blue wave in the November 2018 election, for the democrats to get the majority of both senate and congress to move forward with the inditement?
    The FBI, and any impartial investigation, is completely unconcerned with whether or not this will work out right for whatever team. Mueller shouldn't care about what Democrats want. That would be tantamount to bias, which is what this ludicrous tin-foil-hat response is... accuse the FBI of being anti-Trump.

    If they were anti-Trump, he'd already be toast. I think the case is really what it seems; they're investigating until the investigation is done, not until they "have enough."

  15. #15
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Posts
    235
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Jinsai View Post
    The FBI, and any impartial investigation, is completely unconcerned with whether or not this will work out right for whatever team. Mueller shouldn't care about what Democrats want. That would be tantamount to bias, which is what this ludicrous tin-foil-hat response is... accuse the FBI of being anti-Trump.

    If they were anti-Trump, he'd already be toast. I think the case is really what it seems; they're investigating until the investigation is done, not until they "have enough."
    I understand the impartiality of the FBI investigatiion (too bad the republicans do not) but really my question lies after the determination that of collusion and obstruction of justice. If the Mueller investigation finds evidence that Trump colluded and obstructed justice are we still going to need a democratic house and senate to act on the Mueller findings. After allegros answer I think we do.

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Highland Park, IL
    Posts
    14,384
    Mentioned
    994 Post(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Sister Midnight View Post
    I understand the impartiality of the FBI investigatiion (too bad the republicans do not) but really my question lies after the determination that of collusion and obstruction of justice. If the Mueller investigation finds evidence that Trump colluded and obstructed justice are we still going to need a democratic house and senate to act on the Mueller findings. After allegros answer I think we do.

    Look at the Watergate House Judiciary Committee impeachment votes:

    http://watergate.info/impeachment/an...eachment-votes

    Here are the Articles of Impeachment against Nixon:

    http://watergate.info/impeachment/ar...of-impeachment

    Note: The articles of impeachment were passed only by the Committee on the Judiciary. They were never voted on in the full House of Representatives. Nixon was not impeached.
    Last edited by allegro; 02-05-2018 at 08:50 PM.

  17. #17
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Posts
    235
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by allegro View Post
    Look at the Watergate House Judiciary Committee impeachment votes:

    http://watergate.info/impeachment/an...eachment-votes

    Here are the Articles of Impeachment against Nixon:

    http://watergate.info/impeachment/ar...of-impeachment

    Note: The articles of impeachment were passed only by the Committee on the Judiciary. They were never voted on in the full House of Representatives. Nixon was not impeached.
    Nixon resigned, and as you stated in a previous post, you don't think Trump will ever do that and I agree with you. Trump will burn Washington down and the US for that matter, before he ever walks away from the presidency. I think the only way he will leave office is in handcuffs. I believe even if he loses the 2020 election he will contest the election results even if it was a landslide.

    I think constitutional crisis is on the horizon for the nation, now Trumps lawyers are telling him not to be interviewed with Mueller. This is going to be messy.

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Laughingstock of the World (America)
    Posts
    4,579
    Mentioned
    104 Post(s)
    I would put money on him finishing four terms if Democrats don't take control this year. And honestly, the only way I see that shift happening is IF an investigation brought a formal conclusion of collusion and/or obstruction before midterms. But here's the thing: even if that happens, it's not going to make red suddenly vote blue. Unless it encourages more blues than ever before to get out and vote in record numbers, there's still a very good chance that majorities won't change, and things will continue on the same path they're on now.

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Highland Park, IL
    Posts
    14,384
    Mentioned
    994 Post(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by theimage13 View Post
    I would put money on him finishing four terms
    There's an amendment to the Constitution that only allows two terms, so there's that.

    No President has ever been removed from office.

    Nixon resigned, only because a shitload of his cabinet started getting indicted and it looked like Nixon was becoming an un-indicted co-conspirator.

    But even if a bunch of Trump's cabinet, and family, gets indicted and goes to Federal prison, I sincerely doubt that Trump will resign; he doesn't give a shit; he doesn't give up, he is not a quitter, he doesn't want to look like he "lost," and the most DISTURBING part to me:

    He now has his followers believing that RUSSIA IS OKAY.

    Up until not more than a year ago, Russia has been Enemy Number One to the American Government and the American People, and Putin was just short of a Dictator. Hillary was maligned for selling uranium to an enemy.

    Now? Putin is seen as a fun guy and Trump's best pal.

    All but TWO members of Congress voted to sanction Russia for tampering in our elections, and Congress forced Trump to sign off on these sanctions.

    Trump is now refusing to enforce these sanctions.

    And his followers don't care.

    If you look on the Twitter feed of guys like John McCain or Lindsey Graham and they say something about this, the comments are shit like "WHY DO CARE ABOUT OTHER COUNTRIES, YOU TRAITOR? YOU RINO!!"

    (An aside: I went on a few House Representatives' Twitter feeds, ones I know have J.D.s, ones I know are calling for treason charges against DOJ members and against Rosenstein, and I called for ethics violations charges against them as well as ARDC investigations for knowingly violating canons of ethics; and I quickly received a notice from Twitter indicating that my account had been suspended for 24 hours. LOL LOL LOL. I then terminated my Twitter account. )

    TRUMP IS A TROJAN HORSE FOR RUSSIA, and he doesn't even know it.

    Not that Russia really wants to INFILTRATE the U.S. or anything, but I think they want to destabilize the United States, to their benefit.

    I really do think that Russia has some serious dirt on Trump, too.

    I guess that the House Intel Committee wasn't allowed to take home any of the FISA warrant info, they had to send in one person to a reading room, and they sent in Trey Gowdy, who disputes the info on the memo.

    I have the feeling that the VOLUMES of info may have some really shitty stuff in it that the House DOES NOT want leaked, so this all is a really shitty attempt to discredit the FBI and the DOJ (and FOUR Federal JUDGES who reviewed the volumes of FISA data) before any of this info gets out, eventually.
    Last edited by allegro; 02-05-2018 at 04:00 PM.

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Laughingstock of the World (America)
    Posts
    4,579
    Mentioned
    104 Post(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by allegro View Post
    There's an amendment to the Constitution that only allows two terms, so there's that.
    Hahahahaha. *years, not terms. I should not type when tired.

  21. #21
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Montreal, QC
    Posts
    2,649
    Mentioned
    101 Post(s)
    Are you guys completely dismissing any chances of Trump being reelected in 2020?
    I know it's tough to say at this point since you guys don't know you will be Dems' candidate but .... hey I wouldn't bet the farm on the Democrats in 2020.

  22. #22
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    not atlanta
    Posts
    2,228
    Mentioned
    91 Post(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Deepvoid View Post
    Are you guys completely dismissing any chances of Trump being reelected in 2020?
    I know it's tough to say at this point since you guys don't know you will be Dems' candidate but .... hey I wouldn't bet the farm on the Democrats in 2020.
    I think trump is already running in 2020. There’s a bus company near my house and they have busses that say trump 2020 already. I don’t know who pays for that. Maybe a PAC?

  23. #23
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    san fransisco
    Posts
    1,378
    Mentioned
    41 Post(s)
    had to do a double take to make sure it wasn't the onion https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry...ushpmg00000009
    _Louie

  24. #24
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Posts
    235
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    I think once the Trump administration is over whether it is one term or two. The Trump administration will have more conspiracy theories surrounding it than any other presidency from both liberals and conservatives.

  25. #25
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    san fransisco
    Posts
    1,378
    Mentioned
    41 Post(s)
    wondering who he will blame the market crash on Hillary!!!
    -Loiue

  26. #26
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Highland Park, IL
    Posts
    14,384
    Mentioned
    994 Post(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Louie_Cypher View Post
    wondering who he will blame the market crash on Hillary!!!
    -Loiue
    Obama

  27. #27
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Posts
    235
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Louie_Cypher View Post
    wondering who he will blame the market crash on Hillary!!!
    -Loiue

    "Obama left me with a mess" in 5-4-3-2-1

  28. #28
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    W/A
    Posts
    8,246
    Mentioned
    233 Post(s)
    I mean, you know he doesn't want the job so it shouldn't be a surprise that he's trying more and more outlandish ideas out.

    https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2018...ocrats-treason

    When is our generations, "At long last" moment?

  29. #29
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Highland Park, IL
    Posts
    14,384
    Mentioned
    994 Post(s)
    The Mooch was on This Week with George yesterday and he said he wouldn’t want Trump interviewed if Trump was his client because Trump might walk into something.

    Please allow me to translate in non-legal, layman’s terms: Trump listens to lawyer prep advise, then promptly forgets EVERY fucking thing he was told and VOLUNTEERS information, including incriminating information, at interviews, depositions, etc. the guy is a moron.

  30. #30
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Posts
    235
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by allegro View Post
    The Mooch was on This Week with George yesterday and he said he wouldn’t want Trump interviewed if Trump was his client because Trump might walk into something.

    Please allow me to translate in non-legal, layman’s terms: Trump listens to lawyer prep advise, then promptly forgets EVERY fucking thing he was told and VOLUNTEERS information, including incriminating information, at interviews, depositions, etc. the guy is a moron.

    They already got him on obstruction of justice, the NBC Lester Holt interview from last year.

    Talk about earning your money, I thought Stormy Daniels had to do something disgusting for her money, then there are attorneys for Trump.
    Last edited by Sister Midnight; 02-05-2018 at 10:17 PM.

Posting Permissions