Results 1 to 30 of 409

Thread: Conspiracy Theories

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    the beginning of the end
    Posts
    9,370
    Mentioned
    735 Post(s)
    people who believe every conspiracy theory they read, like my sister in law, drive me crazy. i can't have a rational conversation with her about fringe subjects. (she's convinced that we have teleported people to mars)

    HOWEVEr, there are some things out there that are true and/or baffling.
    Things like the fact that there was never any attack in the Gulf of Tonkin, which was our justification for the invading Viet Nam, are proof that not all conspiracy theories are bullshit.

    The whole UFO thing interests me, but now that we know that our gvmt has been actively disseminating misinformation, you never know what's real and what isn't. I saw a documentary called Mirage Men that gets into recently declassified stuff that shows the length to which the US gvmt has gone to confuse people about UFOs. They literally drove one man crazy by making him think that he was recieving alien transmissions on his computer and radio (they stole his computer and switched it with theirs.)

    I will admit that i most DEFINitely believe in interdimensional "visitors." I'm not sure about the interstellar variety.

    And fucking september 11th.
    I'm not a hardcore truther, but SOMEthing fishy happened that day.
    Why did Norad stand down, and why were they engaged in excercises that involved planes crashing into buildings on the day that such an unlikely scenario really went down?

    And my biggest question is WHAt iN THE FUCK happened to the two planes that didn't hit the towers? Why was there no debris?
    I believe that those two planes were somehow vaporized, maybe with a small tactical nuclear device.

    So yeah, i'm a conspiracy theorist, but i take it all with a grain of salt, unlike my sister in law who expects the Annunaki to arrive any day.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    776
    Mentioned
    36 Post(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by elevenism View Post
    people who believe every conspiracy theory they read, like my sister in law, drive me crazy. i can't have a rational conversation with her about fringe subjects. (she's convinced that we have teleported people to mars)

    HOWEVEr, there are some things out there that are true and/or baffling.
    Things like the fact that there was never any attack in the Gulf of Tonkin, which was our justification for the invading Viet Nam, are proof that not all conspiracy theories are bullshit.

    The whole UFO thing interests me, but now that we know that our gvmt has been actively disseminating misinformation, you never know what's real and what isn't. I saw a documentary called Mirage Men that gets into recently declassified stuff that shows the length to which the US gvmt has gone to confuse people about UFOs. They literally drove one man crazy by making him think that he was recieving alien transmissions on his computer and radio (they stole his computer and switched it with theirs.)

    I will admit that i most DEFINitely believe in interdimensional "visitors." I'm not sure about the interstellar variety.

    And fucking september 11th.
    I'm not a hardcore truther, but SOMEthing fishy happened that day.
    Why did Norad stand down, and why were they engaged in excercises that involved planes crashing into buildings on the day that such an unlikely scenario really went down?

    And my biggest question is WHAt iN THE FUCK happened to the two planes that didn't hit the towers? Why was there no debris?
    I believe that those two planes were somehow vaporized, maybe with a small tactical nuclear device.

    So yeah, i'm a conspiracy theorist, but i take it all with a grain of salt, unlike my sister in law who expects the Annunaki to arrive any day.
    nice. i enjoyed your response. and agree with alot of what you say...but...LOLOLOL..tell your sister in law to STOP waiting on the annunaki. what i have read about them is really bad. ;p plus they took all the gold bazillions of years ago, so no longer need us. honestly, reading von daniken was really neat. not sure if i buy into half of what i read, but i am certainly not into being spoon fed by a liar culture either. i prefer to keep my mind as open as possible, and entertain ideas outside of the box...i guess i am more conspiracy theorist than not.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    9,240
    Mentioned
    553 Post(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by elevenism View Post
    And my biggest question is WHAt iN THE FUCK happened to the two planes that didn't hit the towers? Why was there no debris?
    There was, just not large recognizable pieces. This is because the planes weren't similar to the debris you'd see in an accident where the plane attempted to land. These planes did not skid on the ground, bounce back up into the air, attempt to slow down, and then wreck. They didn't even hit the ground at an angle that would correspond to an attempt to land. They were flown full speed into their targets. Planes, when they are not flown by suicidal madmen, slow down when they're landing. These planes hit their targets nose-first at over 500 miles per hour. The only plane that they think was actually slowed down (by bouncing off the ground before hitting its target) was the Pentagon plane. The reason there's not much visible wreckage there is because the majority of the plane actually traveled into the building. There are overhead shots showing how far the plane actually traveled into the building (as it was exploding). Still, there is some wreckage on the outside lawn, and a clear photo of something with the United logo on it.

    We don't see the same skepticism really over the absence of WTC plane wreckage, because we all saw them explode into a fireball from a variety of angles. We can see how the plane exploded while entering the building. Although, just last year, we found a 5-foot-long part of one of the planes wedged in with a bunch of trash...

    But you seriously think they were hit with tactical NUKES?! Why would we fire a nuclear weapon at the planes! If we wanted to blow them out of the sky, we wouldn't have to use a nuke. We certainly wouldn't shoot a nuke at a plane that would have been on the cusp of flying directly into the pentagon. With flight 93 (the one that crashed in Pennsylvania) you can see a huge crater that the plane made in the ground when it hit! If it was "vaporized" why would there be a huge smoldering crater in the ground?



    In the next photo, you can see the crater from a different angle, and you can see small pieces of debris everywhere.



    here's part of the plane's engine



    additionally, with the pentagon attack, we have several eye witnesses.
    And here's the engine from the pentagon crash:



    here's the landing gear



    part of the plane exterior found on the lawn, with comparison shot to determine the origin


  4. #4
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    776
    Mentioned
    36 Post(s)

    wtfrench?

    so i am making french toast, and it had me wondering "why the fuck is it 'french' toast?".
    ah, but there are also: french braids. french fries. french kisses.

    so, does the 'french' imply that the thing or action is more refined? lol. @Khrz answer for your country ;p @allegro ??? @elevenism ???

    anyway, couldn't think of where else to put this. sorry if it is drifty.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions