Page 161 of 191 FirstFirst ... 61 111 151 159 160 161 162 163 171 ... LastLast
Results 4,801 to 4,830 of 5728

Thread: Controversial Music Opinions...

  1. #4801
    Join Date
    Jan 2017
    Posts
    764
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Sesquipedalism View Post
    Well, I disagree with almost everything you've said—in some places vehemently. Though artists coining their own labels is an interesting phenomenon I hadn't considered before—I wonder if Throbbing Gristle intended to name a genre or eventually felt boxed in by it. Regardless, if you're having conversations about genre in service of the art itself and they aren't overwhelmed by bickering that amounts to little more than gatekeeping and moving things from artificial box to artificial box, then who am I to say you're doing it wrong.
    I do not wish to keep any artist in the box, the opposite actually.

    I just think that it helps with music discussion for me and helps to actually to see how an artist has progressed.

    When I notice that Nine Inch Nails is less focused on Industrial Rock in certain of their works, I don't freak out about it, I simply take a note out of that and see what influences Trent takes from this time, I read up interviews to see what Trent was going for and what influences were this time around to make such a change in sound. I discuss genres and influences because I find them interesting, not because I wish for an artist to stay in a box, I would really hate that, as a NIN fan I feel a lot of frustration when people complain about the change of sound, I understand having a prefered sound from an artist, but most of these people do not even know where this "sound" comes from and what it actually consists of.

    I also find it especially frustrating since most of them do not know how interesting the change of sound actually is, to see something like "Year Zero" be reffered to as a "Pop" record or something felt really frustrating to me and shows a lack of attention to the music some people give and simply dismiss anything just because it is not what they are used to.

    (in general the way people just use Pop is frustrating, people dismiss a lot of music as Pop, just because it happens to have a melody but dismiss everything else.)

    "Everything" is a good example, simply dismissed as a Pop song, when it is a clear love-letter to The Cure and its chorus is certainly very loud and rather aggressive, but a lot of people just don't seem to focus on music enough to make a note out of that.

    A lot of people who throw genres around without knowing anythinga about them are indeed frustrating, but maybe if they knew little bit more we could have had a better conversation, some people totally miss the obvious Pop-song-writting that is withing The Donward Spiral or The Fragile and assume that NIN has always been some kind of purely Experimental Rock act or something, I've even seen people call "The Donward Spiral" "free-form"...which..no..each song has a clear structure.
    Last edited by HWB; 08-20-2020 at 01:27 AM.

  2. #4802
    Join Date
    Jan 2017
    Posts
    764
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    I would also like to add, that even if we didn't have a name for these genres, artists would still get backlash for changing their sound, the sound having a name has nothing to do with that, people just over-act to change and they want artists to meet to their own expectations and rarely want the artist to somehow surprise them.

  3. #4803
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Location
    London
    Posts
    590
    Mentioned
    22 Post(s)
    'Heresy' is a really good pop song.

  4. #4804
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Belarus
    Posts
    4,445
    Mentioned
    98 Post(s)
    Is it suddely a /r/LetsTalkMusic here? (I don't mind, please continue)

  5. #4805
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Indianapolis, IN
    Posts
    1,826
    Mentioned
    19 Post(s)
    I think genre labels are interesting in that people tend to have different definitions of what fits into a particular box.

  6. #4806
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Location
    Calgary
    Posts
    3,519
    Mentioned
    31 Post(s)
    Oh look, there's new Bootie merch to display how I feel... genrefluid...

  7. #4807
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Milwaukee
    Posts
    3,929
    Mentioned
    75 Post(s)
    Sub-genres, particularly in the metal community, are beyond fucking stupid.

    Re: Motörhead, their weren’t a whole lot of bands playing that kind of style of music in the late 70s, hence their appeal and influence. I dig them.

  8. #4808
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    4,255
    Mentioned
    49 Post(s)
    I really need to listen to the Deftones. I read so many good things about them from people I respect the opinion of and I’ve never listened to anything they’ve done. I’m so lazy musically, just listening to same old all the time

  9. #4809
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    W/A
    Posts
    8,282
    Mentioned
    233 Post(s)
    Same. I subscribed to a newsletter for heavier music than I usually listen to because I realized that I actually like it more than what I usually listen to now and I've found a lot of great stuff. Also not great, but you get good with the bad with anything.


    Also I have all of the Deftones stuff downloaded it just looks so daunting when there's so much stuff.

  10. #4810
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    9,278
    Mentioned
    556 Post(s)
    It’s worthwhile to acknowledge genres and subgenres. It can help you discover music that’s “more like this.” With electronic music, the genre sub genre boxes got silly. I’m still convinced that “cold wave” is 100% not a real thing. “Alternative” is the worst way to describe a whole genre of music. 99% of modern vocal music that isn’t hip hop could be called pop. A lot of newer hip hop sounds like pop. Adult/Contemporary was THE “leading genre” most of the time when I was working at a mainstream record store... which was called “Wherehouse,” which has got to be THE shittiest name for a music chain, but at the industry peak it was the most popular music chain in America.

    now that we don’t have actual stores with genre sections, it feels less useful to correctly categorize stuff by genre, and that’s probably a good thing. If there were still indie record stores and zines and whatever, maybe I’d change my mind.
    Last edited by Jinsai; 08-23-2020 at 06:27 AM.

  11. #4811
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Indiana
    Posts
    6,103
    Mentioned
    32 Post(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by WorzelG View Post
    This is from last year but I’m loving Stuart Braithwaite of Mogwai pointing out that Britpop led to Brexit! All the xenophobia of that yanks go home bullshit, urgh

    I'm finally convinced by this picture that Brit-Pop was actually England's equivalent to hair metal/glam rock than grunge.

  12. #4812
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Indiana
    Posts
    6,103
    Mentioned
    32 Post(s)
    Forgot that. I shouldn't post so early in the morning.

  13. #4813
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Location
    Calgary
    Posts
    3,519
    Mentioned
    31 Post(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by katara View Post
    I'd argue that Hair Metal grew out of this genre, too. Just look at Robert Plant from Led Zeppelin with his glorious locks and bare chest.
    I'd say they more looked like hippies... but of course, that did evolve as the they did and 70s moving into a very comfortable glam... as opposed to the glam outfits that were decidedly uncomfortable by the looks of them.

  14. #4814
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    10,653
    Mentioned
    161 Post(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by katara View Post
    I'd argue that Hair Metal grew out of this genre, too. Just look at Robert Plant from Led Zeppelin with his glorious locks and bare chest.
    Nothing to argue about. That's where it came from. It's well known that a majority of the early 80's hair metal glam bands were into the likes of the New York Dolls, Johnny Thunders and various forms of gender bending rock and punk bands. I'd personally argue that Mötley Crüe started it all then with their success at the Sunset Strip everyone ripped off their look and style. I'll ride that horse to its grave defending it.

  15. #4815
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    9,278
    Mentioned
    556 Post(s)
    ...and then there was also T Rex...

  16. #4816
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    9,278
    Mentioned
    556 Post(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by katara View Post
    I posted them earlier today, unless you're raising a point about something else I'm not getting.
    I wasn't responding to you, and I guess I missed your earlier post, so... what the fuck ever

  17. #4817
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Milwaukee
    Posts
    3,929
    Mentioned
    75 Post(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Space Suicide View Post
    I'd personally argue that Mötley Crüe started it all then with their success at the Sunset Strip everyone ripped off their look and style. I'll ride that horse to its grave defending it.
    Yep. And I’d say you can trace it back even closer to Theatre of Pain. Prior to that they were wearing a lot of black and stuff that made them look more like KISS or something scary. Then they went full on with brighter colors and more Aqua Net... along with the gargantuan ballad that is Home Sweet Home. Lots of copycats after that, when the hard rock/metal genre was already exploding.

  18. #4818
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    6,793
    Mentioned
    82 Post(s)
    I always thought that a majority of hair bands used Van Halen and KISS as a template, and some of the other bands mentioned here were influential as well.

  19. #4819
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    4,255
    Mentioned
    49 Post(s)
    I’ve been reading a lot of complaints about the latest Smashing Pumpkins songs. (I actually quite like Cyr!). But I read a while ago an interview with Courtney Love where she suggested Billy would be more jealous of Trent winning an Oscar than anything she was doing, which leads me to ask Why has Billy Corgan not scored a film? I believe Eddie Vedder has scored a film, plus Chris Cornell sang a Bond theme who I would have thought were his main ‘rivals’. I don’t think of Trent as a rival as NIN are just not from that scene. He even mentioned in an interview that in another life he would be scoring films. Why not? I’m sure there must be some director out there with a love of the Pumpkins enough to take him on?

  20. #4820
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Location
    London
    Posts
    590
    Mentioned
    22 Post(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by WorzelG View Post
    I’ve been reading a lot of complaints about the latest Smashing Pumpkins songs. (I actually quite like Cyr!). But I read a while ago an interview with Courtney Love where she suggested Billy would be more jealous of Trent winning an Oscar than anything she was doing, which leads me to ask Why has Billy Corgan not scored a film? I believe Eddie Vedder has scored a film, plus Chris Cornell sang a Bond theme who I would have thought were his main ‘rivals’. I don’t think of Trent as a rival as NIN are just not from that scene. He even mentioned in an interview that in another life he would be scoring films. Why not? I’m sure there must be some director out there with a love of the Pumpkins enough to take him on?
    He has done one score, for Stigmata (1999). I can't remember if it was any good, though.

  21. #4821
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    4,255
    Mentioned
    49 Post(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Tom View Post
    He has done one score, for Stigmata (1999). I can't remember if it was any good, though.
    thanks for that, I actually did more research and he also did a film in 2003 called Spun. Hmm, but he would get more kudos if he did one now as those films didn’t exactly set the world on fire.

  22. #4822
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Location
    San Francisco
    Posts
    920
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by WorzelG View Post
    thanks for that, I actually did more research and he also did a film in 2003 called Spun. Hmm, but he would get more kudos if he did one now as those films didn’t exactly set the world on fire.
    He did some of of the ransom score in 96 too.

  23. #4823
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Chicago, Illinois
    Posts
    10,567
    Mentioned
    528 Post(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by WorzelG View Post
    thanks for that, I actually did more research and he also did a film in 2003 called Spun. Hmm, but he would get more kudos if he did one now as those films didn’t exactly set the world on fire.
    spun was directed by regular collaborator Jonas Akerlund and is a really rough and upsetting watch. billy's music for it is fine ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

  24. #4824
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    4,255
    Mentioned
    49 Post(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by eversonpoe View Post
    spun was directed by regular collaborator Jonas Akerlund and is a really rough and upsetting watch. billy's music for it is fine ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
    Knowing he’s done a couple that have actually worked makes me more confused that he hasn’t gone this route and paired with a director like TRAR/Fincher or Johnny Greenwood

  25. #4825
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Indiana
    Posts
    6,103
    Mentioned
    32 Post(s)
    He also provided music for Ron Howard's Ransom

  26. #4826
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    6,793
    Mentioned
    82 Post(s)
    Dave Mathews doesn't totally suck. I'm hardly a mega-fan, but I find his music to be pleasantly bland.

  27. #4827
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Chicago, Illinois
    Posts
    10,567
    Mentioned
    528 Post(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by GulDukat View Post
    Dave Mathews doesn't totally suck. I'm hardly a mega-fan, but I find his music to be pleasantly bland.
    i was huge into DMB for several years as a youngster.

    he's a better guitar player than he gets credit for, everyone in the dave matthews band is/was a truly skilled musician, and they have a few songs that are straight up brilliant musically. he doesn't have a bad voice, but most of his lyrics are a bit iffy.

    the biggest problem is the culture and the fanbase, which is straight up GARBAGE.

    examples of GOOD songs:







    the first two songs are gorgeous, and the third song is a rare example of them going heavy and dark (which works surprisingly well).

    part of me still really likes some of their music but i never listen to them anymore.

  28. #4828
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    W/A
    Posts
    8,282
    Mentioned
    233 Post(s)
    The "pleasantly bland" description would occupy everything from Stand Up to Away from the World.

    Crash and Before These Crowded Streets have several songs on each that has the band performing and playing at an obscene level. That said, "Crash into Me" was so over-played back in 96/97 that it took a long time for me to not have to skip it.

    however: their insistence on live tracks being the same as "bonus" songs on their album releases chaps me.
    Last edited by allegate; 09-01-2020 at 04:05 PM.

  29. #4829
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Brbr Deng
    Posts
    2,567
    Mentioned
    100 Post(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by eversonpoe View Post
    the first two songs are gorgeous, and the third song is a rare example of them going heavy and dark (which works surprisingly well).

    part of me still really likes some of their music but i never listen to them anymore.
    Live At Luther College by Dave Matthews & Tim Reynolds is a great album of older stuff.


  30. #4830
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Mexico City
    Posts
    6,341
    Mentioned
    169 Post(s)
    Yes, the Dave Matthews band is actually ok (even though they don't rock...)


Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions