Page 29 of 29 FirstFirst ... 19 27 28 29
Results 841 to 861 of 861

Thread: The Transgender Thread

  1. #841
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Chicago, Illinois
    Posts
    9,373
    Mentioned
    423 Post(s)


    well i picked a great fucking time to start HRT.

    this is devastating.

  2. #842
    Join Date
    May 2018
    Location
    Massachusetts
    Posts
    197
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by eversonpoe View Post
    well i picked a great fucking time to start HRT.

    this is devastating.
    Apologies for my ignorance, but does this change mean HRT is not available, or that HRT is not covered by insurance? I read the announcement at HHS.GOV but it was not clear to me. Though I can be a bit daft at times.

  3. #843
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    11,849
    Mentioned
    819 Post(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by zero View Post
    Apologies for my ignorance, but does this change mean HRT is not available, or that HRT is not covered by insurance? I read the announcement at HHS.GOV but it was not clear to me. Though I can be a bit daft at times.
    It means that insurance companies under the ACA used to be barred from discriminating their coverage to LGBTQ people under the ACA; that has now been reversed, and any insurance provider under the ACA is free to deny treatment coverage to LGBTQ individuals who are covered under the ACA. It's aimed directly at transgender individuals, because "the Trump administration defines 'sex discrimination' as only applying when someone faces discrimination for being male or female, and does not protect people from discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation or gender identity." See this article for details. Because cruelty is the point, the decision was announced during Pride week and on the anniversary of the Pulse Nightclub massacre.

    Last edited by allegro; 06-12-2020 at 09:14 PM.

  4. #844
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Chicago, Illinois
    Posts
    9,373
    Mentioned
    423 Post(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by zero View Post
    Apologies for my ignorance, but does this change mean HRT is not available, or that HRT is not covered by insurance? I read the announcement at HHS.GOV but it was not clear to me. Though I can be a bit daft at times.
    Quote Originally Posted by allegro View Post
    It means that insurance companies under the ACA used to be barred from discriminating their coverage to LGBTQ people under the ACA; that has now been reversed, and any insurance provider under the ACA is free to deny treatment coverage to LGBTQ individuals who are covered under the ACA. It's aimed directly at transgender individuals, because "the Trump administration defines 'sex discrimination' as only applying when someone faces discrimination for being male or female, and does not protect people from discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation or gender identity." See this article for details. Because cruelty is the point, the decision was announced during Pride week and on the anniversary of the Pulse Nightclub massacre.
    one of the scariest implications is that it allows discrimination not just by insurance providers, but also by any healthcare provider. if a trans person is having a heart attack and gets brought to the emergency room, it would allow a transphobic doctor to refuse to treat that person with no legal repercussions. or, as a more timely example, if a trans person caught the coronavirus and needed immediate medical attention, they could be refused treatment.

  5. #845
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    11,849
    Mentioned
    819 Post(s)
    That latter implication in an emergency situation that is actually prevented by the hippocratic oath as well as hospital and health provider liability policies, especially due to precedent in court cases. It’s been argued and won, (previously related to racist doctors who refused to treat black people, and doctors who refused to treat AIDS patients). This comes down to corporate policy and customer service, as well as avoidance of large malpractice lawsuits being paramount.

    More importantly, AMA ethics rules clearly prohibit it:

    The AMA states: "Physicians who offer their services to the public may not decline to accept patients because of race, color, religion, national origin, sexual orientation, gender identity or any other basis that would constitute invidious discrimination."

    There is a pending SCOTUS decision that will settle all these matters, which was argued last year, opinion is expected in the coming months.

    https://www.laborandemploymentlawcou...iscrimination/

    POWER TO THE PEOPLE!
    Last edited by allegro; 06-13-2020 at 05:04 PM.

  6. #846
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    11,849
    Mentioned
    819 Post(s)
    VICTORY!!!! Gorsuch wrote the decision. The SCOTUS site is having problems so nobody is seeing the decision, yet.

    Last edited by allegro; 06-15-2020 at 09:59 AM.

  7. #847
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Chicago, Illinois
    Posts
    9,373
    Mentioned
    423 Post(s)
    nice to have some good news for once. oy veh.

  8. #848
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    W/A
    Posts
    2,533
    Mentioned
    91 Post(s)

  9. #849
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Somerset, UK
    Posts
    965
    Mentioned
    21 Post(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by allegro View Post
    VICTORY!!!! Gorsuch wrote the decision. The SCOTUS site is having problems so nobody is seeing the decision, yet.


    I don't understand, are gay people not already protected against that over there???

  10. #850
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Chicago, Illinois
    Posts
    9,373
    Mentioned
    423 Post(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by GibbonBlack View Post
    I don't understand, are gay people not already protected against that over there???
    nope. because we in the queer community (and especially those of us in the trans community, regardless of orientation) are seen as sub-human by many people, and a lot of those people have positions of power.

  11. #851
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Somerset, UK
    Posts
    965
    Mentioned
    21 Post(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by eversonpoe View Post
    nope. because we in the queer community (and especially those of us in the trans community, regardless of orientation) are seen as sub-human by many people, and a lot of those people have positions of power.
    So, if someone doesn't want to hire someone because they're gay they can just not hire them?

  12. #852
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    11,849
    Mentioned
    819 Post(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by GibbonBlack View Post
    I don't understand, are gay people not already protected against that over there???
    Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 bars employment discrimination based on race, religion, national origin and sex. But “sex” did not include sexual orientation or gender identity.


    HOWEVER, it should be noted that many protections under Title VII - particularly sex or gender - are often hollow and do not totally protect employees; for THAT, we need the passage of the Equality Act, H.R. 5:

    https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-...se-bill/5/text

    Quote Originally Posted by GibbonBlack View Post
    So, if someone doesn't want to hire someone because they're gay they can just not hire them?
    Well, yes ... or black, or a woman, or of a certain ethnic group, etc. Which happens ALL the time. It’s REALLY hard to get treated fairly, here. Employers break these laws all the time, which is why the courts are constantly busy with employment lawsuits. But, the system has to at least have legislative protections in place to support those court cases.
    Last edited by allegro; 06-15-2020 at 05:37 PM.

  13. #853
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Somerset, UK
    Posts
    965
    Mentioned
    21 Post(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by allegro View Post
    It’s REALLY hard to get treated fairly, here. Employers break these laws all the time
    That's what I was getting at. So there are laws? It's just no one really gives a shit that they exist?

    Sorry, I am being completely ignorant. The whole thing just strikes me as weird

  14. #854
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    11,849
    Mentioned
    819 Post(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by GibbonBlack View Post
    That's what I was getting at. So there are laws? It's just no one really gives a shit that they exist?

    Sorry, I am being completely ignorant. The whole thing just strikes me as weird
    There is ONE Federal law, yes, from 1964. But it’s vague, so it’s open to interpretation.

    And of course laws are broken ALL the time. Employment laws aren’t criminal laws; employers don’t get arrested for violating these laws, they just get sued. And the employers often have much deeper pockets than employees. Labor unions help, but those have also been neutered by recent court decisions.

  15. #855
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Somerset, UK
    Posts
    965
    Mentioned
    21 Post(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by allegro View Post
    There is ONE Federal law, yes, from 1964. But it’s vague, so it’s open to interpretation.

    And of course laws are broken ALL the time. Employment laws aren’t criminal laws; employers don’t get arrested for violating these laws, they just get sued. And the employers often have much deeper pockets than employees. Labor unions help, but those have also been neutered by recent court decisions.

    Ah now I see. That's...well, it's not great

  16. #856
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Chicago, Illinois
    Posts
    9,373
    Mentioned
    423 Post(s)
    two things!

    one: after sarah trimmed my hair and beard, i trimmed my leg hair with an electric hair trimmer because i haven't actually shaved my legs in :: checks watch :: 12 years? it took me 20 minutes. i didn't even have the energy to properly shave them after that. i am also not nearly as flexible as i once was. woof. hopefully the hormones will help it not grow in as much. or i'll be able to save up some money for laser/electrolysis.

    and two: i'm thinking of changing my name to Mae (as a reference to both Mae West and Mae Borowski from the video game Night In The Woods). it would allow me to keep my initials, and it sounds similar to Max (though i've been going by Maxwell for a long time). thoughts?

  17. #857
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    11,849
    Mentioned
    819 Post(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by eversonpoe View Post
    two things!

    one: after sarah trimmed my hair and beard, i trimmed my leg hair with an electric hair trimmer because i haven't actually shaved my legs in :: checks watch :: 12 years? it took me 20 minutes. i didn't even have the energy to properly shave them after that. i am also not nearly as flexible as i once was. woof. hopefully the hormones will help it not grow in as much. or i'll be able to save up some money for laser/electrolysis.

    and two: i'm thinking of changing my name to Mae (as a reference to both Mae West and Mae Borowski from the video game Night In The Woods). it would allow me to keep my initials, and it sounds similar to Max (though i've been going by Maxwell for a long time). thoughts?
    1) funny, once I went through menopause, the best thing about it was not having to shave my legs, anymore! Leg-shaving sucks, ugh. But once you start, you get good at it. If not, lots of people go for waxing! Lasts a long time. I think the HRT will make the leg hair softer and sparser?

    2) Mae is a cool name! Oddly enough, my Grandmother' best gf's name was ... Max! (Grandma was born in 1907 so this is old-school.) Mark Zuckerberg's daughter is named Max, short for "Maxima." But, Mae is a pretty nice name, too.
    Last edited by allegro; 06-24-2020 at 07:46 PM.

  18. #858
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Somerset, UK
    Posts
    965
    Mentioned
    21 Post(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by eversonpoe View Post
    two things!

    one: after sarah trimmed my hair and beard, i trimmed my leg hair with an electric hair trimmer because i haven't actually shaved my legs in :: checks watch :: 12 years? it took me 20 minutes. i didn't even have the energy to properly shave them after that. i am also not nearly as flexible as i once was. woof. hopefully the hormones will help it not grow in as much. or i'll be able to save up some money for laser/electrolysis.
    I use hair removal cream for my legs. It's amazing!!

  19. #859
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    11,849
    Mentioned
    819 Post(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by GibbonBlack View Post
    I use hair removal cream for my legs. It's amazing!!
    OMG, yes, it's great!!! Great idea! (Stinky, but great, LOL.)

  20. #860
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Chicago, Illinois
    Posts
    9,373
    Mentioned
    423 Post(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by allegro View Post
    1) funny, once I went through menopause, the best thing about it was not having to shave my legs, anymore! Leg-shaving sucks, ugh. But once you start, you get good at it. If not, lots of people go for waxing! Lasts a long time. I think the HRT will make the leg hair softer and sparser?

    2) Mae is a cool name! Oddly enough, my Grandmother' best gf's name was ... Max! (Grandma was born in 1907 so this is old-school.) Mark Zuckerberg's daughter is named Max, short for "Maxima." But, Mae is a pretty nice name, too.
    i was really good at it in high school! i probably could have done it with my eyes closed (not really). but i was also skinnier and way more flexible so i guess we'll see how this goes haha

    max is totally a doable gender-non-specific name, and while i'm still going to be me, i want to distinguish myself a bit. sarah has been suggesting "mj" (my first two initials) and consistently making the joke "like from spider man!" but i don't really feel like it fits me. oddly enough, mae was also her suggestion.

    @GibbonBlack i have never used a hair removal cream or done waxing, but not a bad idea...

  21. #861
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    456
    Mentioned
    8 Post(s)
    I haven't used hair removal cream since the 90s. Has it gotten any better? I'm kinda lazy about shaving, as it's just me and my mom in the house. I have 1-2x a week, and always on the day I wash my sheets. Fresh clean sheets + shaved legs = awesome.
    @eversonpoe I think Mae is a cool name.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions