Page 87 of 87 FirstFirst ... 37 77 85 86 87
Results 2,581 to 2,587 of 2587

Thread: 11/3/2020 - President, Senate, House, LOCAL

  1. #2581
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    W/A
    Posts
    3,484
    Mentioned
    107 Post(s)


    they seem fired-up about something...

  2. #2582
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    7,458
    Mentioned
    420 Post(s)
    And even Fox is now reporting that early voting from democrats is double that of republicans. Not sure how they collect that information though...

  3. #2583
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    LI, NY
    Posts
    2,560
    Mentioned
    24 Post(s)
    Was early voting really a thing in 2016 though? Obviously it existed, but i dont remember hearing about it back then or it being a viable option for everyone, but everybody is doing it now because a. The pandemic, and b. Why not? Regardless, I don't think it's a fair comparison to make. The difference in total voting numbers once it's over is what I'd be curious to see.

  4. #2584
    Join Date
    Feb 2018
    Posts
    1,063
    Mentioned
    11 Post(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Jinsai View Post
    And even Fox is now reporting that early voting from democrats is double that of republicans. Not sure how they collect that information though...
    fear mongering. "cmon guys, we can't let them beat us, get out and vote!!"

  5. #2585
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Cincinnati, OH
    Posts
    1,891
    Mentioned
    49 Post(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Jinsai View Post
    And even Fox is now reporting that early voting from democrats is double that of republicans. Not sure how they collect that information though...
    Exit polling. I gave an exit poll when I early voted at my precinct a few weeks ago. Also, voter registration data but to be fair, this isn't always a concrete indicator of how people are voting.

  6. #2586
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    W/A
    Posts
    3,484
    Mentioned
    107 Post(s)
    Holy hell. This guy uses a lot of words to say a lot of nothing.

  7. #2587
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    7,458
    Mentioned
    420 Post(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by allegate View Post
    Holy hell. This guy uses a lot of words to say a lot of nothing.
    Not sure what you're referring to specifically, but still, I'm reminded of this stream of consciousness mess of meandering word vomit in July 2016, and we still went on to elect him anyway.

    "Look, having nuclear - my uncle was a great professor and scientist and engineer, Dr John Trump at MIT; good genes, very good genes, OK, very smart, the Wharton School of Finance, very good, very smart - you know, if you're a conservative Republican, if I were a liberal, if, like, OK, if I ran as a liberal Democrat, they would say I'm one of the smartest people anywhere in the world - it's true! - but when you're a conservative Republican they try - oh, do they do a number - that's why I always start off: Went to Wharton, was a good student, went there, went there, did this, built a fortune - you know I have to give my like credentials all the time, because we're a little disadvantaged - but you look at the nuclear deal, the thing that really bothers me - it would have been so easy, and it's not as important as these lives are (nuclear is powerful; my uncle explained that to me many, many years ago, the power, and that was 35 years ago; he would explain the power of what's going to happen and he was right - who would have thought?!), but when you look at what's going on with the four prisoners - now it used to be three, now it's four - but when it was three and even now, I would have said it's all in the messenger fellas, and it is fellas because, you know, they don't, and they haven't figured that the women are smarter right now than the men, so you know, it's gonna take them about another 150 years - but the Persians are great negotiators, the Iranians are great negotiators, so, and they, they just killed, they just killed us."

    That quote is not excluding anything. That's a direct verbatim quote, from way back when we still had months left to decide whether or not this man was "presidential material."

Posting Permissions