Faceplams Faceplams:  0
Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3
Results 61 to 78 of 78

Thread: James Bond 25 (2019)

  1. #61
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Vancouver BC
    Posts
    6,797
    Mentioned
    78 Post(s)
    Lashana Lynch is the new 007 in the next Bond film.

    Apparently the story involves James Bond being retired and Lynch as his successor; Bond is then called out of retirement one last time to 'avert a global crisis'.

  2. #62
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    6,249
    Mentioned
    378 Post(s)
    James Bond is a wank fantasy for the male ego... he's a ludicrously alpha dude.

    The idea that they would make Bond female just feels like they're understanding that it would be such an "OHHHHHHHH!!!!" moment, without having the awareness to understand WHY it would be. James Bond is a dude. It's his character. He's a jerk, and a misogynist, and that's who he is.

    He is for dudes what harlequin romance is for girls. It's insane and stupid to swap it up.

  3. #63
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    4,154
    Mentioned
    60 Post(s)
    People online are either having a meltdown, i.e, "PC SJW Nazis!" or are saying "It's about damn time!"

    There is a lot of confusion. Lynch is not the new James Bond. She has the 007 codename at the start of the new movie, as Craig's character is retired. As far as anyone knows, she will not take over for Craig.

  4. #64
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    6,249
    Mentioned
    378 Post(s)
    I just want to assert that just because I think it's stupid pandering bullshit that utterly misses the point, I'm not having a meltdown. I could really give a fuck about the Bond franchise. I'm not into harlequin romance.

  5. #65
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Cincinnati, OH
    Posts
    1,673
    Mentioned
    37 Post(s)
    So, to be clear, Lynch is playing the new 007, not James Bond. It's too early to say for sure, but maybe they're deciding to change the formula? Take the universe that's been established, keep a continuity going with the other actors, but have a new agent in place as 007 who isn't James Bond. I'm a lifelong Bond fan and I'm intrigued. Take the chance and see what happens. If it doesn't work, reboot and/or go back and watch the other TWENTY SIX Bond movies that exist.

  6. #66
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    4,154
    Mentioned
    60 Post(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by ltrandazzo View Post
    So, to be clear, Lynch is playing the new 007, not James Bond. It's too early to say for sure, but maybe they're deciding to change the formula? Take the universe that's been established, keep a continuity going with the other actors, but have a new agent in place as 007 who isn't James Bond. I'm a lifelong Bond fan and I'm intrigued. Take the chance and see what happens. If it doesn't work, reboot and/or go back and watch the other TWENTY SIX Bond movies that exist.
    It's unclear to me what the plan is. This is Craig's last movie, so either the next movie after 25 will be a spin-off, with Lynch as 007, or it will cast a new lead as James Bond for James Bond 26.

  7. #67
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Cincinnati, OH
    Posts
    1,673
    Mentioned
    37 Post(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by RhettButler View Post
    It's unclear to me what the plan is. This is Craig's last movie, so either the next movie after 25 will be a spin-off, with Lynch as 007, or it will cast a new lead as James Bond for James Bond 26.
    I don't think it's clear to anyone except for the folks making the movie right now.

  8. #68
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Canton, Ohio
    Posts
    847
    Mentioned
    11 Post(s)
    I think the shock is less that the new 007 is going to be a dark complected woman, and more that 007 isn't going to be James Bond. Like, conceptually, 007 is a title, so the tag could have belonged to anyone. But as mentioned, it belonged to one character, James Bond, for 26 movies. I kinda get though that's easier to replace the character completely than to try to change the character that's already established as a womanizer across 3 or 4 decades of films.

  9. #69
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    4,154
    Mentioned
    60 Post(s)
    A little info on this history of the 00 as it relates to Bond 25:

    https://www.mi6-hq.com/sections/arti...j4qa6RQV27g94k

  10. #70
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Ontari-ari-ario
    Posts
    3,796
    Mentioned
    159 Post(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Demogorgon View Post
    I think the shock is less that the new 007 is going to be a dark complected woman, and more that 007 isn't going to be James Bond. Like, conceptually, 007 is a title, so the tag could have belonged to anyone. But as mentioned, it belonged to one character, James Bond, for 26 movies. I kinda get though that's easier to replace the character completely than to try to change the character that's already established as a womanizer across 3 or 4 decades of films.
    Yep, and it's really the only logical way forward for the franchise... I've said as much before, in another of the movie threads on this board. They basically have no other choice. As @Jinsai points out, a Colonial-era misogynist alcoholic bulldog IS the James Bond character. That's... just not something global audiences want to see right now. Best use of the material they have: focus on a different character in the universe next. And giving that character the iconic 007 designation could be a great way to pass the mantle onward.
    Last edited by botley; 07-15-2019 at 08:08 AM.

  11. #71
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    4,154
    Mentioned
    60 Post(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by botley View Post
    Yep, and it's really the only logical way forward for the franchise... I've said as much before, in another of the movie threads on this board. They basically have no other choice. As @Jinsai points out, a Colonial-era misogynist alcoholic bulldog IS the James Bond character. That's... just not something global audiences want to see right now. Best use of the material they have: focus on a different character in the universe next. And giving that character the iconic 007 designation could be a great way to pass the mantle onward.
    Bond was passe by the end of the 60's, in the mid 90's, the 00's and he is now, yet audiences still flock to see him. I don't see how Bond is any more out of step in 2019 than he was during other times. A spin-off series sounds cool, but people still want a Bond flick.

  12. #72
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    New York, New York
    Posts
    3,126
    Mentioned
    69 Post(s)
    I don't understand the love for James Bond at all. I think I watched one James Bond movie when I was a kid. That was enough for me.

  13. #73
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    6,249
    Mentioned
    378 Post(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by botley View Post
    giving that character the iconic 007 designation could be a great way to pass the mantle onward.
    agreed, though it feels like a “Red Sonja” to answer the Conan franchise, but more potentially dangerous in miscalculation of the initial point... I guess we just need to see where they go with the concept.

  14. #74
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Location
    on my way to hell
    Posts
    796
    Mentioned
    15 Post(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Demogorgon View Post
    I think the shock is less that the new 007 is going to be a dark complected woman...
    Will we get male versions of Pussy Galore, with names like Dick Hardthrust or Seymour Cox?

  15. #75
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Location
    Minneapolis, MN
    Posts
    1,446
    Mentioned
    19 Post(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Dr Channard View Post
    Will we get male versions of Pussy Galore, with names like Dick Hardthrust or Seymour Cox?
    I mean, it'd only be fair...

  16. #76
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Location
    London
    Posts
    1,402
    Mentioned
    11 Post(s)
    Well it shits all over the theory that ALL the bonds are cannon, they all take the name Bond and 007 and just retire(die) and the new one takes the name.
    Honestly for a studio that has been through 2 directors on this movie alone because they didn't like what they were doing, i don't think they have the balls to recast bond as anyone other then a white male, whether it works or not. This just feels like a cheap "OMG" moment to get hype for a film that has been a slight clusterfuck to this point. Also would have been nice to get this surprise during the film, not several months before it's even finished!

  17. #77
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Location
    London
    Posts
    1,402
    Mentioned
    11 Post(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Dr Channard View Post
    Will we get male versions of Pussy Galore, with names like Dick Hardthrust or Seymour Cox?
    I'm voting for Hugh Janeus.

  18. #78
    Join Date
    Feb 2018
    Posts
    235
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Mike Oxlong

Posting Permissions