Page 100 of 127 FirstFirst ... 50 90 98 99 100 101 102 110 ... LastLast
Results 2,971 to 3,000 of 3787

Thread: Random General Headlines

  1. #2971
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    4,709
    Mentioned
    172 Post(s)
    The SF MUNI hacker has been hacked!

    Quote Originally Posted by DigitalChaos View Post
    The SF transit's fare systems got infected with ransomware yesterday. There is still no solution or ETA on possible fix. Free rides for everyone.
    I'm way too entertained by this...

    http://www.sfexaminer.com/hacked-app...ystem-crashes/
    Last edited by DigitalChaos; 11-30-2016 at 12:35 PM.

  2. #2972
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    4,709
    Mentioned
    172 Post(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Deepvoid View Post
    Yeah I know they reported it as a shooting first, which is actually mind boggling. I swear to God, the medias need to start getting their shit together.
    The urge to make everything an anti-gun push is strong. That's what pushes this shit.

    Here is what Gavin Newsom (a very big anti-gun politican in CA) posted on Facebook.... he later deleted it.




  3. #2973
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    France
    Posts
    2,083
    Mentioned
    148 Post(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by DigitalChaos View Post
    The urge to make everything an anti-gun push is strong. That's what pushes this shit.
    Plus, you know... The fact that when something horrible happens in an American school, your first thought isn't "knife"...

  4. #2974
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Belarus
    Posts
    3,005
    Mentioned
    36 Post(s)

    Unhappy

    Holy fucking crap...
    Brazilian football club Chapecoense involved in a plane crash, heading to Colombia for international game.
    A few survivors left.

    https://www.theguardian.com/world/li...olombia-latest

    Joining a string of another poor souls flying for football/hockey matches (Manchester United, Torino, Pakhtakor, Zambia national team, Lokomotiv Yaroslavl...)

  5. #2975
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    401
    Mentioned
    16 Post(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Khrz View Post
    Plus, you know... The fact that when something horrible happens in an American school, your first thought isn't "knife"...
    And when something horrible happens in France (or anywhere) your first thought is muslim terrorists.

  6. #2976
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    France
    Posts
    2,083
    Mentioned
    148 Post(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Sallos View Post
    And when something horrible happens in France your first thought is muslim terrorists.
    I'm sorry, did I pinch a nerve, or was there a further point in stating the obvious there? Because I fail to see how that contradicts my statement. It actually supports it in that yes, this is the same phenomenon.

  7. #2977
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    4,709
    Mentioned
    172 Post(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Khrz View Post
    Plus, you know... The fact that when something horrible happens in an American school, your first thought isn't "knife"...
    Of course not. It's "oh boy. I can push my gun control agenda with this! That'll get me some progressive votes in the upcoming cycle!"

    Have you not seen the gun control emails in the DNC leaks? That's how they talk. They also toss away any most gun deaths that "confuse" with a demographic that is inconvenient (skin color, religion). Well, that's only if they aren't jumping on a story within seconds.

  8. #2978
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    401
    Mentioned
    16 Post(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Khrz View Post
    I'm sorry, did I pinch a nerve, or was there a further point in stating the obvious there? Because I fail to see how that contradicts my statement. It actually supports it in that yes, this is the same phenomenon.
    I just find it interesting how, when something like this happens, the left wants it to be a gun violence issue, to push their agenda, same when the right wishes its muslims doing it, and the left wishing it was a white christian male, to push another agenda.

  9. #2979
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    France
    Posts
    2,083
    Mentioned
    148 Post(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Sallos View Post
    I just find it interesting how, when something like this happens, the left wants it to be a gun violence issue, to push their agenda, same when the right wishes its muslims doing it, and the left wishing it was a white christian male, to push another agenda.
    You mean that every political and ideological party sees any event through their own particular lens ? Groundbreaking.

    But that wasn't my point. My point is that given the context it was fair to assume that someone had *shot* the school, just like it would be fair to assume that any instance of suicide bombing in France was motivated by salafism. The initial report was of a shooting. With, you know, a gun. Whether politics jumps on the bandwagon comes after the fact, after the initial reporting and let's face it, that's a thing they do.

    That's a thing @DigitalChaos just did, again, ironically, since nobody here went the guns right route initially. The very thing he constantly chastises the left for, jumping on the bodies to plant his flag on it.
    Part of the left goes "should be less guns", part of the right says "they sure wish they had more guns now !". Speaking of France, I remember distinctly the guys on the US right going "see what happens when you restrict guns ?" right after the fact. It's nice to pretend to stand on some sort of moral high ground and to be above and beyond the herded masses. At least make an effort not to be blind on one side.

  10. #2980
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    New York City
    Posts
    4,184
    Mentioned
    214 Post(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Khrz View Post
    That's a thing @DigitalChaos just did, again, ironically, since nobody here went the guns right route initially. The very thing he constantly chastises the left for, jumping on the bodies to plant his flag on it.
    Part of the left goes "should be less guns", part of the right says "they sure wish they had more guns now !". Speaking of France, I remember distinctly the guys on the US right going "see what happens when you restrict guns ?" right after the fact. It's nice to pretend to stand on some sort of moral high ground and to be above and beyond the herded masses. At least make an effort not to be blind on one side.
    I have pointed this out previously. He gets so indignant about the left using these situations to further their stance on guns, but sees no problem when he is doing it time after time. I don't understand that at all. The belief that one side uses these tragedies to advance their goals is false... Both are doing it. Like people will still be bleeding in the hallway, and he will be here hollering about what the left is going to do.

    It would be good for everyone to have some compassion and acknowledge the loss during these situations instead of jumping straight into what it means for their personal politics.

  11. #2981
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    4,709
    Mentioned
    172 Post(s)
    Yes yes. Pointing out that the left turns everything into an anti-gun push is *totally* the same as turning it into a pro-gun topic! People should just keep their mouths shut and let the left do it. .. Mmmmk

  12. #2982
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    New York City
    Posts
    4,184
    Mentioned
    214 Post(s)
    Nope. I think it would be good for EVERYONE to pause and acknowledge that these are real people with real families who are grieving.

    I said that both sides use these tragedies to further their stances, and it is shitty all round. But you specifically always come in yelling about the left doing the exact same thing that you do. Which is very odd.

  13. #2983
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    France
    Posts
    2,083
    Mentioned
    148 Post(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by DigitalChaos View Post
    Yes yes. Pointing out that the left turns everything into an anti-gun push is *totally* the same as turning it into a pro-gun topic! People should just keep their mouths shut and let the left do it. .. Mmmmk
    And derailing a conversation about a tragedy towards a a pet topic of yours is *exactly * the same as stopping people from turning it into a gun discussion, righto!

  14. #2984
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    4,709
    Mentioned
    172 Post(s)
    Ah. So pointing it out (in response to someone's surprise that the public was mislead) is derailing. So the message is, again, to be quiet and not point it out. Let the left push an agenda.

    K


    No

  15. #2985
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    France
    Posts
    2,083
    Mentioned
    148 Post(s)
    Man, you're sure showing the left. I hope all those crooked politicians are reading the forum though, it would be so sad if your brave rebellion was to take place in a vacuum.

  16. #2986
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    4,709
    Mentioned
    172 Post(s)

    Random General Headlines

    I'll just keep an eye out for continuing discussion on OSU. Don't let me stop you. Not sure why it came to a halt as soon as it was discovered there were no guns... hrmmm
    Last edited by DigitalChaos; 11-30-2016 at 11:53 AM.

  17. #2987
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Highland Park, IL
    Posts
    10,795
    Mentioned
    784 Post(s)
    The topic of the people who were injured at OSU got derailed. BY YOU. You drifted the thread. You could have put the thread back on track, but you didn't.

    Some people on campus initially panicked and thought it was a shooting; it wasn't, but they still Tweeted misinformation about a shooting; not to intentionally mislead people, but because they were panicked and scared. Some concerned people then Tweeted about too many shootings in this country, based on the information being tweeted from campus. The media put out information based on information coming from campus.

    Despite that, many people were injured by a disturbed person who drove onto campus and stabbed some people.

    We could talk about those injured people, it's sad, then move on, but you already drifted the thread to drumbeat your same old agenda, drifting it off the original topic.

    Donald Trump says that the attacker should not have been in the country in the first place, even though he was a legal permanent resident and a student; ISIS has praised the attack.

    ISIS has praised the attack, according to a self-described news agency for the terrorist organization. The group called Artan a “soldier of the Islamic State” who had “carried out the operation in response to calls to target citizens of international coalition countries.” But ISIS has used that phrasing to describe other violent actors without laying specific claim to the act itself. And so far, investigators say there are no indications that Artan had direct connections to ISIS or al Qaeda. Investigators suspect he was inspired by a mix of terrorist ideologies and that’s what sparked him to act “out of the blue”.

    U.S. Rep. Adam Schiff, a California Democrat who sits on the House Intelligence Committee, issued a statement Tuesday evening saying it appeared Artan had been radicalized online. Schiff stated, however, that there was no evidence yet that he was communicating with radical terror organizations overseas.
    Last edited by Cat Mom; 11-30-2016 at 12:48 PM.

  18. #2988
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    France
    Posts
    2,083
    Mentioned
    148 Post(s)
    Yeah, oddly enough, Isis has always been rather straightforward whether it comes to claiming responsibility for an attack. I don't think they ever pretended to be behind actions that weren't truly theirs.
    Here they're "only" encouraging that kind of attack.
    I'm a bit confused though, are they saying he was radicalised, or was the reason for this attack completely different?

  19. #2989
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Vancouver, BC
    Posts
    696
    Mentioned
    30 Post(s)
    This essay written by a retarded Professor by the name of James Livingston made me angry:

    https://aeon.co/essays/what-if-jobs-...ut-the-problem

    so I e-mailed him with this:

    Hello James,

    Your article is a load of shit. Imagine a world where people don't get paid for work. Let's suppose that anything they do, they do because they want to. It's their own desire and free will. I don't think anyone would be entitled to the fruits of these pursuits. They would have to be given out of kindness. So you have some people "producing" more goods of value than they can use - like food from farming. Some of these people choose to share. Some of them don't. Why do some chose not to share? Because some lazy fucks did nothing to help produce these goods. Why should they get any? There has to be some measure of value and a system reciprocity.

    Perhaps in the future when robots produce everything and do all human jobs and provide all human services. When the production system is self-sufficient and self-repairing. then we can be free of "forced" labour.

    Until then, we need to work/provide a service/cheat the system.

    You damn fool.
    ----------------
    James' reply:

    Fuck off, you moron.




    James LivingstonDepartment of History
    Rutgers University-New Brunswick

  20. #2990
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    France
    Posts
    2,083
    Mentioned
    148 Post(s)
    And that's newsworthy how, exactly?

  21. #2991
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Vancouver, BC
    Posts
    696
    Mentioned
    30 Post(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Khrz View Post
    And that's newsworthy how, exactly?
    because his essay was in the news. his essay IS the news. my response to his essay is tertiary, usually just like when anyone comments on a news item.
    Last edited by cashpiles (closed); 12-04-2016 at 05:22 AM.

  22. #2992
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    France
    Posts
    2,083
    Mentioned
    148 Post(s)
    Somehow it feels way more fitting in the "little things that piss you off" thread. That's not exactly a headline...

  23. #2993
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Location
    London
    Posts
    555
    Mentioned
    18 Post(s)
    http://www.nme.com/news/music/us-mem...y-fire-1892967

    Damn that warehouse fire which killed at least 36 people in Oakland. ...claimed the life of one of my favourite up and coming musicians.
    The band was a twopiece duo called Them are Us Too. Released an absolutley beautiful album in 2015 called Remain. Shoegazey/Dream Pop band. Were not that famous, not sure how many know of them,...but still. One of the best new groups.

    Awful....

  24. #2994
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Stockholm, Sweden
    Posts
    112
    Mentioned
    17 Post(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Exocet View Post
    http://www.nme.com/news/music/us-mem...y-fire-1892967

    Damn that warehouse fire which killed at least 36 people in Oakland. ...claimed the life of one of my favourite up and coming musicians.
    The band was a twopiece duo called Them are Us Too. Released an absolutley beautiful album in 2015 called Remain. Shoegazey/Dream Pop band. Were not that famous, not sure how many know of them,...but still. One of the best new groups.

    Awful....
    Crushed by this, Remain was an excellent album. Fuck 2016.

  25. #2995
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Laughingstock of the World (America)
    Posts
    3,932
    Mentioned
    96 Post(s)
    I hope that, as the grief eventually starts to fade, the people who are angry at politicians, etc, in Oakland will learn from this and begin to understand why some things are the way they are in the adult world (meaning the world full of codes, regulations, permits, etc). I say this because I read a couple of quotes from younger people who were basically saying "it's fucked up that we're poor artists and we're being kicked out of Oakland already and now they're telling us we were supposed to have permits for shit?"

    I get it. You're grieving, you're angry, and being told that this could have been prevented (or at least, significantly improved) by playing by the rules gets you mad. But please...rules exist for a reason. Fire codes exist for a reason. From all of the reports I've read, this place sounded like it was guaranteed to end the way it did if something were to happen. And well...something happened.

    Accidents still happen, but they can be reduced in severity by keeping current with safety procedures. When the victims' friends and families who are lashing out finally begin to heal, I really hope that they can not only see that, but maybe use their new insight to help make sure that things like this don't happen again. It's a terrible tragedy, and hopefully we can honor the victims by learning from it.

  26. #2996
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    New York City
    Posts
    4,184
    Mentioned
    214 Post(s)
    https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/...ouse?CMP=fb_gu

    SIX WEEKS WHAT

    I just don't even know what the hell to say. This is horrifying. Summoning @allegro to assure me that this doesn't have a chance of standing... Ugh.

  27. #2997
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Highland Park, IL
    Posts
    10,795
    Mentioned
    784 Post(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Sarah K View Post
    https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/...ouse?CMP=fb_gu

    SIX WEEKS WHAT

    I just don't even know what the hell to say. This is horrifying. Summoning @allegro to assure me that this doesn't have a chance of standing... Ugh.
    No way. Even a prior conservative SCOTUS ruling said minimum ability to strictly regulate or ban is at viability which is 24 to 28 weeks. Most women don't even know they are pregnant at 6 weeks. Heartbeat doesn't equal viability.

    See Casey (1992):

    https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/91-744.ZS.html

    (g) No change in Roe's factual underpinning has left its central holding obsolete, and none supports an argument for its overruling. Although subsequent maternal health care advances allow for later abortions safe to the pregnant woman, and post-Roe neonatal care developments have advanced viability to a point somewhat earlier, these facts go only to the scheme of time limits on the realization of competing interests. Thus, any later divergences from the factual premises of Roe have no bearing on the validity of its central holding, that viability marks the earliest point at which the State's interest in fetal life is constitutionally adequate to justify a legislative ban on nontherapeutic abortions. The soundness or unsoundness of that constitutional judgment in no sense turns on when viability occurs. Whenever it may occur, its attainment will continue to serve as the critical fact. Pp. 17-18.
    (c) As with any medical procedure, the State may enact regulations to further the health or safety of a woman seeking an abortion, but may not impose unnecessary health regulations that present a substantial obstacle to a woman seeking an abortion.

    (d) Adoption of the undue burden standard does not disturb Roe's holding that regardless of whether exceptions are made for particular circumstances, a State may not prohibit any woman from making the ultimate decision to terminate her pregnancy before viability.
    In the most recent abortion ruling heard by the current 8-Justice SCOTUS, the decision was 5 to 3 with Justice Kennedy as the swing vote. Even if Trump nominates a Pro-Life Justice (and that Justice is confirmed), the vote would be 5 to 4 in favor of upholding Roe v Wade.
    Last edited by Cat Mom; 12-08-2016 at 04:09 PM.

  28. #2998
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    W/A
    Posts
    1,466
    Mentioned
    70 Post(s)
    Things I didn't think I'd read in the news:

    Pope Francis uses scatological term in discussing media, fake news

    Reuters reports the pope also delved into “precise psychological terms” when discussing fake news production and consumption.
    “He said scandal-mongering media risked falling prey to coprophilia, or arousal from excrement, and consumers of these media risked coprophagia, or eating excrement,” Reuters reports.
    I mean, you do you Frankie. I guess that's the fancy Latin way they make it a sin?

  29. #2999
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Toronto
    Posts
    1,187
    Mentioned
    12 Post(s)
    Great headline...


    9-Year-Old North Carolina Boy, Says He Was Fat-Shamed By Santa

    http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/2016/12..._13513770.html

  30. #3000
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Northwest Indiana
    Posts
    2,389
    Mentioned
    92 Post(s)

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions