Page 75 of 79 FirstFirst ... 25 65 73 74 75 76 77 ... LastLast
Results 2,221 to 2,250 of 2364

Thread: Gun Talk - News, Laws, etc.

  1. #2221
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Canton, Ohio
    Posts
    636
    Mentioned
    8 Post(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by DigitalChaos View Post
    So my never-fired weapons contribute to the perception that gun owners like to shoot shit. K lol.
    You own them out of the childish sentiment that having them pisses people off. Do you really not get how immature that is?

    The perception of the antis is irrelevant. It's been tried and they will just continually take and take. Appealing to them is a waste of time when you can make their opinions irrelevant.
    And your solution is to go out of your way to antagonize people by owning weapons you never intend to shoot? Way to contribute, dude.

  2. #2222
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    5,203
    Mentioned
    172 Post(s)

    Gun Talk - News, Laws, etc.

    "Childish" lmao. It's over your head dude. It's cool. Don't worry about it. You continue to focus on a very very small aspect of what I explained.

  3. #2223
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Canton, Ohio
    Posts
    636
    Mentioned
    8 Post(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by DigitalChaos View Post
    "Childish" lmao. It's over your head dude. It's cool. Don't worry about it. You continue to focus on a very very small aspect of what I explained.
    I doubt that. Go ahead and explain it for me again. Use small words. I'm sure you're just a misunderstood social justice genius slumming it with the rest of us plebs. Lay it on me, I'm all eyes.

  4. #2224
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Vancouver, BC
    Posts
    696
    Mentioned
    30 Post(s)
    The United States is fucked. Canadians have just as many guns per capita... but our laws are different..and that could be what makes all the difference......

  5. #2225
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    New York City
    Posts
    3,845
    Mentioned
    204 Post(s)
    No they don't.

  6. #2226
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Northwest Indiana
    Posts
    2,083
    Mentioned
    86 Post(s)
    Just let @DigitalChaos have his thread and the ridiculous mentality that if big bad gov decides to come get his guns (they wonít), he would get a single shot off. Heís just going to be a condescending prick to any challenge, well thought out or otherwise, and thatís a shame because over the years I had respect for him but that dwindles with every post in this thread. Goddammit, I hate this thread. Somebody tell me to stop reading it. Itís only good for eye rolls and sadness.

    So let me be a condescending prick for a couple mean albeit logical thoughts here:

    The dumbest gunnut belief of all is that their guns will mean a fucking thing when not only do the govt have more guns and better weapons in general but can also reduce you and your house to a paste via drone.

    You want a pistol or two to protect your home from intruders? Cool. Not my thing, but I understand and respect your choice. You need a rifle to hunt? I really donít like hunting, I think itís pretty much the weakest and least impressive thing you can do but even for this lame purpose? Sure. Fine.

    Which brings us to...

    The second dumbest gunnut belief is that they need anything other than a pistol or two and/or rifle. The 2nd amendment was written when guns were musket loaded. The founding fathers didnít anticipate assclowns walking around Target with AR 15s and small penises. Nobody needs an AR-15 that isnít in the military, including police.

    Because I imagine this might be the last time I post in this thread (never say never), letís throw a ďFuck the NRA and their shitbag greedy lobbying thatís bought Congress and kept us from having many of the existing gun control laws enforced (also fuck the weak ATF) and from having any kind of sane gun control discussions.Ē

    Flame away. I said my piece.
    Last edited by Swykk; 12-01-2017 at 03:51 PM.

  7. #2227
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Vancouver, BC
    Posts
    696
    Mentioned
    30 Post(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Sarah K View Post
    No they don't.
    Wow you’re right. I guess this was some “common knowledge” thrown around in Canada thst seems to be false. Canada is 11th in the world, right under France..... but Canada is still far more peaceful...like 2/3 less gun murders...per capita

  8. #2228
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Canton, Ohio
    Posts
    636
    Mentioned
    8 Post(s)
    This seems like it could be a big deal:

    https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/...cks/901017001/

  9. #2229
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    5,203
    Mentioned
    172 Post(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Demogorgon View Post
    This seems like it could be a big deal:

    https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/...cks/901017001/
    LMAO. I can't wait to see the repubs process this. If it happened under Obama they would freak. But under Trump I'm betting they will take a more rational "well they weren't supposed to have guns... party of law and order something something something"


    And wtf is up with NICS, it already gives a pass to anyone with a fake identity. But it's also giving passes to known-bad identities in the thousands?!?!?

  10. #2230
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Canton, Ohio
    Posts
    636
    Mentioned
    8 Post(s)
    Yeah, this situation looks to be one massive fuck up, and trying to seize all of these weapons is going to lead to more fuck ups and a lot of dangerous situations. These are people who aren't suppose to have guns in the first place because of something in their background check, so, it's rock and a hard place: let them keep the weapons knowing they may use them to do criminal acts, or move in and take them while trying not to get shot in the process. No winners here.

  11. #2231
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    5,203
    Mentioned
    172 Post(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Swykk View Post
    He’s just going to be a condescending prick to any challenge, well thought out or otherwise, and that’s a shame because over the years I had respect for him but that dwindles with every post in this thread.
    Over the years you'd see that I give equal thought as a reply provides. Nothing about what Demogorgan's replies were "well thought out." They were purposefully myopic, and thus, not worth a deep reply.

  12. #2232
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    5,203
    Mentioned
    172 Post(s)

    Gun Talk - News, Laws, etc.

    I'm not the most articulate, so if you want a better perspective about what I was putting down, check this documentary that came out this week:

    http://www.imdb.com/title/tt6333062/

    The doc goes beyond just guns. I have put significant portions of my last several years into the efforts you see on display here.


    e: it's on iTunes, Hulu, etc.
    Last edited by DigitalChaos; 12-08-2017 at 12:11 PM.

  13. #2233
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Canton, Ohio
    Posts
    636
    Mentioned
    8 Post(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by DigitalChaos View Post
    Over the years you'd see that I give equal thought as a reply provides. Nothing about what Demogorgan's replies were "well thought out." They were purposefully myopic, and thus, not worth a deep reply.
    1) You apparently don't know what "myopic" means.
    2) My thoughts were direct observations of something you yourself said, chiefly that you own guns for the political clout it gives you in arguments rather than for any reasonable desire or need to own them. You've never even fired a shot, again by your own admission, and someone who actually understands and respects firearms on any level will make a point to go to a range and at least know how they operate and what they're capable of.
    3) You didn't give a deep reply because your initial reasoning was exactly what I said it was and there isn't anything deeper to it. Someone on the previous thread asked you to clarify before I chimed in, and you essentially repeated yourself with different words. Despite my sarcasm, I still gave you a third opportunity to go in depth about your thoughts, and you've declined using the age old teenage trope "nah, you just don't understand". You aren't a radical of any stripe; you're irresponsible, self-absorbed, and terribly misinformed.

  14. #2234
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    5,203
    Mentioned
    172 Post(s)

    Gun Talk - News, Laws, etc.

    Another video demonstrating the politics of gun building



    fucking infowar... pause it at the last minute unless you wanna hear fucking alex fucking jones
    Last edited by DigitalChaos; 12-19-2017 at 10:37 PM.

  15. #2235
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Vancouver, BC
    Posts
    696
    Mentioned
    30 Post(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Demogorgon View Post
    1) You apparently don't know what "myopic" means.
    2) My thoughts were direct observations of something you yourself said, chiefly that you own guns for the political clout it gives you in arguments rather than for any reasonable desire or need to own them. You've never even fired a shot, again by your own admission, and someone who actually understands and respects firearms on any level will make a point to go to a range and at least know how they operate and what they're capable of.
    3) You didn't give a deep reply because your initial reasoning was exactly what I said it was and there isn't anything deeper to it. Someone on the previous thread asked you to clarify before I chimed in, and you essentially repeated yourself with different words. Despite my sarcasm, I still gave you a third opportunity to go in depth about your thoughts, and you've declined using the age old teenage trope "nah, you just don't understand". You aren't a radical of any stripe; you're irresponsible, self-absorbed, and terribly misinformed.
    gun collectors don’t need to shoot their guns... it’s purely for aesthetics... the look, the feel, the smell... why does he need to learn how to use them if he’s just collecting? What danger do they possibly pose if they aren’t loaded?

    and don’t say someone is going to break into his house and steal them or load them....

    maybe instead of judging, open your mind. You bloody pissant

  16. #2236
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Western New York
    Posts
    2,230
    Mentioned
    33 Post(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by cashpiles View Post
    why does he need to learn how to use them if he’s just collecting? What danger do they possibly pose if they aren’t loaded?
    Literally rule number one of handling a gun is you always treat it as if it is loaded and could fire. That means knowing how they work.

  17. #2237
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    5,203
    Mentioned
    172 Post(s)

    Gun Talk - News, Laws, etc.

    Quote Originally Posted by sick among the pure View Post
    Literally rule number one of handling a gun is you always treat it as if it is loaded and could fire. That means knowing how they work.
    Considering I built every gun in this category (of never having fired)... pretty sure I know how they work. Every single pin, spring, etc. This is much more knowledge about the internals than most military members who carry similar guns.

    Gun collectors know how their guns work and treat them as loaded. There is never a need for bringing them to the range to achieve those skills.
    Last edited by DigitalChaos; 12-19-2017 at 10:49 PM.

  18. #2238
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Western New York
    Posts
    2,230
    Mentioned
    33 Post(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by DigitalChaos View Post
    Considering I built every gun in this category (of never having fired)... pretty sure I know how they work. Every single pin, spring, etc. This is much more knowledge about the internals than most military members who carry similar guns.

    Gun collectors know how their guns work and treat them as loaded. There is never a need for bringing them to the range to achieve those skills.

    Good to know, though I never said anything to the contrary. Just explaining to cashphiles why it's important that even collectors know their firearms and treat them with care and respect their capability.

  19. #2239
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Vancouver, BC
    Posts
    696
    Mentioned
    30 Post(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by sick among the pure View Post
    Literally rule number one of handling a gun is you always treat it as if it is loaded and could fire. That means knowing how they work.

    You check to see if the gun is loaded and a bullet is in the chamber... if there are no bullets in the gun you can do whatever the fuck you want with it. I could literally jam the tip of the barrel up my ass.
    Last edited by cashpiles (closed); 12-20-2017 at 12:14 AM. Reason: sick among the pure has selective reading disease

  20. #2240
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    5,203
    Mentioned
    172 Post(s)

    Gun Talk - News, Laws, etc.

    Hell yeah. That's what I do every night. What's your favorite gun lube for butt stuff? I'm partial to frog lube. It leaves your butthole smelling minty fresh.

    Don't get me started about the *real* reason people buy bump stocks.

  21. #2241
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Canton, Ohio
    Posts
    636
    Mentioned
    8 Post(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by cashpiles View Post
    it’s purely for aesthetics... the look, the feel, the smell... why does he need to learn how to use them if he’s just collecting?
    That isn't why he has them though, as he himself said. He said, multiple times, that he owns guns as a political and societal statement.

    and don’t say someone is going to break into his house and steal them or load them....
    Why would I say that? People who break into houses generally aren't looking for guns, they're looking for untraceable shit they can resell quickly.

    maybe instead of judging, open your mind. You bloody pissant
    oh no, please don't, my one weakness... petty insults... I'm so fragile, please stop... my delicate feelings simply can't take it. /sarcasm

    It's a new forum, and good ol' cashpiles is still the worst troll in the history of ETS.

  22. #2242
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Canton, Ohio
    Posts
    636
    Mentioned
    8 Post(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by DigitalChaos View Post
    Considering I built every gun in this category (of never having fired)... pretty sure I know how they work. Every single pin, spring, etc. This is much more knowledge about the internals than most military members who carry similar guns.
    Knowing how to build a car doesn't teach you how to drive it. Knowing how to build a computer doesn't teach you how to program it. Knowing how to build a firearm doesn't teach you the correct posture, handling, or hand-eye coordination to actually hit a target without popping a shoulder or a wrist out of socket.

    There is never a need for bringing them to the range to achieve those skills.
    Yes, there absolutely is, as I've just mentioned. Not taking the time to do so, once again, is irresponsible.

  23. #2243
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    9,833
    Mentioned
    759 Post(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by DigitalChaos View Post
    Considering I built every gun in this category (of never having fired)... pretty sure I know how they work. Every single pin, spring, etc. This is much more knowledge about the internals than most military members who carry similar guns.

    Gun collectors know how their guns work and treat them as loaded. There is never a need for bringing them to the range to achieve those skills.
    Gun owners who fire at ranges learn how to take their guns apart because you have to CLEAN them, and you need to take them apart to a certain degree in certain states while transportating the gun to the range.

    You’re serious, you’ve never fired your gun?

    You’ve said, in this thread, that you owned a gun to protect your family. Did that change?

    Also, the talk in this thread always seems to ignore the revolver. SPRINGS, lol.

  24. #2244
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    5,203
    Mentioned
    172 Post(s)
    For those not following: current scope is weapons I've built and have no expectation to use. Of course I go to the range with anything I might use. You gotta at least make sure the sights are zeroed, the ammo properly cycles, etc

  25. #2245
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    9,833
    Mentioned
    759 Post(s)

  26. #2246
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Indiana
    Posts
    4,850
    Mentioned
    25 Post(s)

  27. #2247
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Montreal, QC
    Posts
    2,738
    Mentioned
    93 Post(s)
    above all it's a lie

    I really want to do shrooms. If there was a shroom store (like there were in the UK for a while before 2005), I'd walk in and buy them, and do them.

    and yet it's been years, like 10+ years, since I've come across them.

    No shrooms for me.

  28. #2248
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    san fransisco
    Posts
    1,270
    Mentioned
    40 Post(s)
    was kind of watching the chief of the NRA on CNN while on the treadmill. why is thier solution always more guns? when is that logic ever work. cigarettes are bad. we need more cigarettes?there are a few more amendments to the constitution then just the 2nd.
    -louie

  29. #2249
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Indiana
    Posts
    4,850
    Mentioned
    25 Post(s)

  30. #2250
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    san fransisco
    Posts
    1,270
    Mentioned
    40 Post(s)
    so many holes in the idiots plan: funny how every solution envoles buying and selling more guns. NRA's by it's true name America Association of Arms dealers.
    -Louie

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions