Originally Posted by
aggroculture
Because the "brand" features Scott Weiland on vocals? There are few cases in which you can replace a vocalist and get away with it. And this isn't one of them. 20 years after your peak, with a vocalist moonlighting from a much larger band, a guy who has even less credibility than your original, iconic singer, and who is basically impersonating said singer? I'm just not seeing it.
Also, the new, Staley-less AIC is very disappointing. Should have let that one lie, fellas.
I get that people have to pay the rent: it's just sad that these 90s musicians can't find success without reverting to their former decades-old glories.