the_great_destroyer wrote:both songs are fucking awesome... my only complaint, however, is they are pretty minimal. i want layers and layers. there are still new sounds i find myself hearing when i listen to the fragile. but once again, in no way am i knocking these new tracks. they are awesome and may 5th can't come soon enough. what a great time to be a fan.
This is more or less
precisely how I feel. I really enjoy "Discipline." Seriously, I am enthralled by it--either despite or because of its poppiness I revel in it and, in less than one week, it quickly surpassed every other contender (of 3,700 songs) in my iTunes for Most Played. While I just discovered "Echoplex" (I work at a Mexican restaurant and, thus, have been catering to fat white people all evening for Cinco de Mayo--a holiday Mexicans barely celebrate) and thus, cannot render fair judgment upon it, I think I know how I'll feel in the end. Right now--and I assume also well into the future--I find myself smitten by it.
But in the end, I expect I will be somewhat disappointed by the stamina/ longevity of both tracks. I can listen to
Broken or
The Downward Spiral sixteen or fourteen years hence, respectively, and still find something new in each. They have always and will always fascinate me because they are so complex--"layer[ed] and layer[ed]," as said by The_Great_Destroyer.
And though I loved
With Teeth and greatly savored
Year Zero, I already know that neither have the replayability of the aforementioned two discs. Both of TR's later albums have moments in which I am aware of deep complexity, subtlety and richness ("Right Where It Belongs," "Only," "Survivalism," "The Warning," "Another Version of the Truth"), but they can't compare to the almost-idefatigable
Downward Spiral or
Fragile. More to the point, I feel I already know this of "Discipline" and "Echoplex." (
Ghosts I-IV, I rest assured,
will stand the test of time with aplomb.)
BUT
This means nothing about my relative ability to enjoy either of Nine Inch Nails' new tracks. In fact, I find myself crazed by both. "Echoplex" seems more lyrically mature than its immediate predecessor. It is definitely more lyrically ambiguous and, I admit, I find myself confounded by its content at first (I'm on half-a-dozen listens). This, however, is good for a song (in my book): it means it's comprised of something worth paying attention to.
"Echoplex" is also less immediately poppy which, in the long run, usually helps a song stand up for me. And, to contradict Mcpancakes (WOW:
that may have been the most ridiculously absurd thing I've ever said), I truly enjoy the entirely unapologetic drum machine. Synthetic instrumentation, sometimes, is far superior to real-life strings and skins. (Unless one assumes such a thing is an affront to the natural order and/or god which, obviously, makes one an idiot.) The rather visceral guitar/ bass make an intriguing counterpoint to the very artificial percussion. I'm not, at the moment, thrilled with the "outro." Presently, I find it a bit dull, but I expect I might soon unearth some hidden complexity.
Regardless, I think both tracks are worthy additions to the Nine Inch Nails oeuvre. "Echoplex," in fact, probably even falls into the top fifty percent of things TR's released. And after all is said and done, I am so pleased by both tracks that I will spend hard-earned cash on the disc/ download. And after all is said and done, isn't that what matters?