Results 1 to 30 of 531

Thread: Controversial Cinema-Related Opinions

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    San Francisco, CA
    Posts
    598
    Mentioned
    7 Post(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Corvus T. Cosmonaut View Post
    Sure, all movies are to some extent like "moving paintings". Filmmakers are artists that paint with light, cinema is called "motion picture", etc. Beach was pointing out that Lynch is a more explicitly expressionist director, more carefully composing his frames and packing them with visual information beyond the norm. He's a master of the mise en scène. (Of course he's also extremely involved with motion picture audio, so it's no surprise that he's been playing with sound as far back as his very first films, nor that in his current hiatus from the movies he's fashioned himself as a kind of recording artist.)
    What's interesting is that he has shown he can tell a straight ahead story (albeit both biographies) in "The Elephant Man" and "The Straight Story." Two simple stories in which his "personality" did not overshadow. I will concede that Lynch is talented and influential in his styling. I just dislike his movies, save for those two.

    An example of Director(s) that I believe strike the fine balance between quirky/weird and story-telling prowess are the Coen Brothers. The quirks don't impede the story; but, instead, enhance in my opinion. A lot of the aesthetics of "No Country For Old Men" seemed simultaneously attempted by PTA in "There Will Be Blood." Both were basically westerns, musing upon the decay of society and/or a man's soul in which the scenery seemed to be as much of a character as the actors. In fact, I believe I read an anectdote wherein PTA and the Coen Brothers crossed paths while filming each respective film, using the same landscape. In my opinion, the Coens got it right and PTA got it wrong.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    293
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    I think it's time to change the name of this thread to - Ignorant Childish Intolerant Cinema-Related-Opinions.

    People should really judge a film based on how successfully it fullfills it's own premise.

    Also calling out a deliberate feature of a movie isn't an opinion - it's a moot point.
    Last edited by Lutz; 09-13-2012 at 09:21 PM.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    San Francisco, CA
    Posts
    598
    Mentioned
    7 Post(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Lutz View Post
    I think it's time to change the name of this thread to - Ignorant Childish Intolerant Cinema-Related-Opinions.

    People should really judge a film based on how successfully it fullfills it's own premise.

    Also calling out a deliberate feature of a movie isn't an opinion - it's a moot point.

    Wow, intolerant to contrary opinion, much? A discussion isn't childish merely because you disagree with the opinions expressed. Your post, on the other hand is the epitome of childish. If you don't want to participate, then simply ignore. Spewing your disgust in a thread in which you clearly disagree is a truly moot point. The opinions of others are no more or less valid than yours; deal with it.

Posting Permissions