Because "we won" is stronger than "that's morally not right".
Because "we won" is stronger than "that's morally not right".
this is his supporters answer to all his bullshit but-but we won, which even he questions screaming about sources where were your sources, for all that birther shit you talked, where are your tax returns?
-louie
Abortions for some, tiny Trump flags for others.
A political prankster passed out small Russian flags emblazoned with President Trump’s name at the annual Conservative Political Action Conference — where Trump supporters blindly waved the banners during his Friday morning speech until they were confiscated, according to online reports.
That's...does that kind of read to anyone else that the Trump administration has taken our country away?
The media banning thing; doesn't it go against the First Amendment?
I'm Canadian, remember. I'm still stunned that a man like Trump became President.
I could be totally wrong here (I very likely am), but I think that the right to a free press simply means that the press can say whatever the hell they wanted and the government can't take legal action against them. I don't believe it guarantees the press access to anything (such as Spicey's "gaggle" or whatever bullshit that was today). If that sort of rule exists, I would imagine it was legislation passed at a later time.
everyone needs to watch this https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/13th_(film)
you may think marijuana laws were getting better guess again
-louie
with all the chaos going on they are quietly taking away your freedom away trump just rescinded an Obama law restricting tax dollars DOJ going to private prisons guess what for-profit prisons need? Prisoners guess what fascist regime do imprison political opponents, if you're a felon you can't vote can't own a gun, good luck getting a job ask pussy riot they know how it works
god help me sounding like Alex jones
-Louie
it's like religion when something good happens it's God's hand when it's bad it's evil or the devil's influence, all hail the wondrous and almighty trump
-Louie
Tom Perez is awarded the position of chairman of DNC via votes from status quo lobbyists who act as though corporations need their feelings protected from being vilified and that we lost the election because we weren't central enough... in contrast to the Republicans who won riding on the back of a man who represents some of worst neo-fascist tendencies the conservative platform has to offer.
Oh, and they also voted against a ban on corporate donations because Hillary didn't get nearly enough fundraising to win the election and why win elections when you can be a lapdog shill and be given every financial advantage in the private sector regardless of who is in the White House? Here's to hoping the country still exists after Trump leaves office in 2025.
several Syrian's who are nominated can't attend oscar's
Louie
If George Carlin were alive today, he could do this same exact bit almost word-for-word and it would ring truer today than it did when this was originally recorded.
Last edited by Aladdinsanity; 02-25-2017 at 05:20 PM.
And in a move that surprises approximately zero people, 45 announces that he's too thin skinned to attend the annual correspondents' dinner.
Hey man...the Major of my city is a Muslim...my city has 15 Million people....his name is Sadiq Kahn ...he is a wonderful guy..he has a strong chance of being the next Prime minister of the UK...
He tolerates no radical islamic bullshit and is progressive....
Its not about blaming muslims...but if you want to live in the real world..you will admit like Sadiq Kahn would that there is a major problem in the islamic world....80 Percent of all terror attacks in 2016 were islamic related in Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria, Nigeria..
Last edited by Exocet; 02-25-2017 at 09:39 PM.
incompetent man-child idiot
-Louie
And look what's going on, there.
Worth reading: https://www.theguardian.com/politics...p-nigel-farage
What fucking fancy hotel was he in where they RFIDd the fucking pillow cases and towels?? Holy shit. Those are some valuable towels.
Yes he has been overly paranoid for a long time and he's too full of himself to be truly any better than Trump. He might be a good advisor once in a while as to cyber security but that's about it. He's cute but that is not an electable quality. And cute + nuts = nah.
Sweden newly confused by the person appearing on Fox as "Swedish Security Advisor," since nobody in their government knows who he is... because apparently he's been living in the US since 1994 and has no position in the Swedish government...
Countdown till Trump tweets about all the fascinating stuff he said on Fox...
http://www.sbs.com.au/news/article/2...r-crime-debate
Tracking via Facebook is why I HATE Facebook.
That article is interesting. Not too long ago, I Googled some shit about Obama that was appearing in Instagram comments, something I'd never seen, and I wanted to see if it had any validity. The search resulted in PAGES AND PAGES of right wing sources going on about this allegation, none of them very recognizable or credible, with not ONE main stream media source and no centrist to liberal sources. None. I thought at least one would address these allegations and I sincerely doubt it's a liberal coverup. These right wing sources are clearly taking advantage of Google search algorithms which are no longer solely dependent on keywords.
But why did they need RFID? That's overkill for laundry. RFID is like laundry LOJACK. "We located our stolen wash cloth in a cottage near the mountains. Alert the authorities!!" Most hotels just allow for loss or they charge guests or the laundry service for big missing items. Theft is why the Four Seasons doesn't put their name or logo on valuable room items. Tracking them by radio frequency is stupid, but I digress.
Last edited by allegro; 02-26-2017 at 11:57 AM.
I don't know what the hell you're talking about, because you keep contradicting yourself. "Google isn't your phone's autocorrect" - but also "google is trying to give you exactly what you are looking for".
Pick one.
If I were to type in "[x] is..." in a search engine, I would be doing so because I am looking for a objective information, perhaps a definition, of [x]. I'm looking for facts first, so that I may then form my own opinion. I'm not looking for someone else's opinion first. I get that the results will include comments about the subjective status of [x], but not as the top result. To clarify:
If I type in "mainstream media is..." I want to be told WHAT it is, objectively. I want to be told that "mainstream media" is a phrase for longstanding, established news outlets that have been in existence for decades. I want to be told that these are outlets that are staffed by people who studied at journalism school. I want to be told that they rely on a set of established criteria, such as multiple sources, before deciding something is fit to publish. I want to be told that they actively seek to set aside personal bias, to the best of their ability, and report on ALL sides of a story. I want to be told that they do not have mission statements that include "exposing the left / right bias of other so-called news".
But that's not what Google did. When he typed in "mainstream media is...", Google took the liberty of saying it is dead. It is dying. It is fake. It is fake news. That's all that it told him.
THAT IS NOT AN OBJECTIVE SEARCH.
Does it reflect what many people are currently talking about? Yes, it does. But that's all speculation. It's subjective. It's people's opinions. When I go to the single largest reference desk on the fucking planet, I want the top results to my searches to be pure, objective facts that match my search criteria - not a computer's guess or opinion. If I walked into the library tomorrow and asked the reference librarian where to find maps of local hiking trails, I would expect him / her to tell me where those maps are. I would not expect the reply to be "the hiking around here is terrible". I would expect the information I requested. After looking at the maps I was provided, I might then go back and ask them for their opinion of the local trails. But that's only after I've looked at the objective information I asked for.
look up three gods logic
-louie
I don't think any mainstream media sources are actually unbiased either. Newspapers like the Daily Mail are mainstream and laughably biased towards a certain demographic. To that end, why did Trump ban the Daily Mail from his White House thing, home of Piers Morgan and Katie Hopkins i'd say it was on message