Add Violence Back Cover...ARG?

[cdm]

I suppose, and if the Google photo wasn't eight months old, I'd be more inclined to go look for the van. As for the store, I'm working when it's open anyway, but I wouldn't even know what to do if I went there.

Further to that thought, would a GPS tag in a source photo survive a massive Illustrator overhaul to the final image?

[Toadflax]

Further to that thought, would a GPS tag in a source photo survive a massive Illustrator overhaul to the final image?

I thought that, too, and I don't know. From what I understand, Photoshop retains all original photo info as long as you're not saving and resaving it (which a pro would never do anyway).

[d-signet]

I thought that, too, and I don't know. From what I understand, Photoshop retains all original photo info as long as you're not saving and resaving it (which a pro would never do anyway).

Photoshop should retain that data no matter how many times you resave. The only time it would be expected to lose it is if you saved to a format that didn't support them.

The cover image had been resaved a minimum of three times IIRC from the metadata

There were also four photoshop "work paths" in the jpg, but again these COULD be just forgetfulness. One was named something like asdasdasd

It would be good for somebody to see if there are any layers/paths/metadata in this new version.

This should make that schematic t-shirt make a little more sense anyway


And we still never decoded the first NTAE video.