So Zimmerman had a right to stand his ground from Martin? OK, I want you to think slowly and carefully about this. Do you also then acknowledge Martin had a right to stand his ground from Zimmerman? Or is Martin already guilty because of his other crimes which you have so graciously enlightened us on? Do you see how the ambiguity in the law can make for a more dangerous society when anyone can claim self defense for anything, especially in a society where we are encouraged to walk around carrying concealed handguns?Originally Posted by 50 Volt PhantomWhat about calling him a coon?Originally Posted by 50 Volt PhantomAre you capable of acknowledging that both clothing AND RACE appear to play a part in this? That it was not simply one or the other?Originally Posted by 50 Volt PhantomAttacking a dead kid to avoid admitting to political critiques is a straight up piece of shit move.Originally Posted by 50 Volt PhantomThis is the same defensive tactic as attacking Obama/Occupy for “creating” class resentment. The fault doesn’t lie with the person pointing out the problem. In fact, the whole strategy of the modern GOP is to create resentment, and your bullshit typifies what makes it sadly successful on the internet. It is the perfect medium to spread lies and disinformation because there are no consequences to it. You don’t have to answer to the person you’re slandering. If you’re pointed out as being wrong, you can simply choose to ignore it and wait it out until the subject changes, or move on to some other hole on the web.Originally Posted by 50 Volt Phantom