Page 67 of 67 FirstFirst ... 17 57 65 66 67
Results 1,981 to 2,001 of 2001

Thread: Trump 2017: Year Zero

  1. #1981
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    England
    Posts
    913
    Mentioned
    17 Post(s)
    I honestly think it's that Trump has an overwhelming hatred of Barack Obama, and the Affordable Care Act is Obama's biggest legacy. If it can be killed, Trump will do it, even if the move is unpopular.

  2. #1982
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    419
    Mentioned
    17 Post(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Jinsai View Post
    I think the ACA will stay uncontested, if only because Trump and Friends have realized that it's actually a really complex thing, and they have no fucking idea what they're doing in regards to that sort of stuff... It was a talking point, and now, rather than try to actually focus on an issue, he's going to just say "they blocked my attempt to do something about it! Blame them!"

    The truth is, he realized that health care reform is not just another stupid thing you check off a box on, because it pissed people off - even his supporters. Ultimately, Trump doesn't want to address issues or fix things. He wants love and adoration. The only reason Obamacare was an issue for him to begin with was because he perceived that there was a lot of people who were mad about it. He doesn't have any concept of how to fix it, and his team of propagandists certainly don't give a single fuck on an ideological level.
    people are wondering if it's intentional incompetence, the freedom caucus,(anything but),bunch of stogy old white dude, Koch bothers PAC, felt it still gave to much to away to commoners, like pre-existing conditions the castle might be stormed before this whole thing is over
    -Louie
    Last edited by Louie_Cypher; 03-25-2017 at 11:23 AM.

  3. #1983
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    US of A
    Posts
    1,797
    Mentioned
    41 Post(s)
    As much as it generally pisses me off that people are being as shitty to Trump over insignificant things as the right was to all the tiny things Obama did, this makes me giggle.



    (This is not a photoshop job; this is literally for sale)


  4. #1984
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    419
    Mentioned
    17 Post(s)
    stayed in Washington no outrageous tweets lost health care another fail on your campaign promises - 0 lies - a lot
    -Louie

  5. #1985
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    419
    Mentioned
    17 Post(s)
    that's ok big guy keep trying i know it's tough, but you can do it my little man, I know, but you know you can't steal second unless you get on first, so dust yourself off put on your big boy pants and get back out there, and remember our little deal, if you stay off twitter and study up on your policies we might let you drive the fire truck, fire truck!, OK Donnie you want me to check under you bed again for that bad old Obama? OK I'll leave the door open a crack for you OK little buddy we got a big day of golf tomorrow so let's turn that frown upside down
    -Louie
    Last edited by Louie_Cypher; 03-26-2017 at 10:12 AM.

  6. #1986
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    2,710
    Mentioned
    39 Post(s)

  7. #1987
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    US of A
    Posts
    1,797
    Mentioned
    41 Post(s)
    No matter how many times the man has failed, and no matter how many articles like this I've read, I still don't personally know a single person who voted for him who has since expressed even the tiniest bit of regret or frustration at the administration thus far.

  8. #1988
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    8,390
    Mentioned
    675 Post(s)
    Except the failure of this newest HC Bill isn't Trump's failure: It's the fractured Republican party's failure. (And, yes, it's that fucking pompous Paul Ryan's failure.)

    The Moderate Republicans and the EXTREME Conservative Republicans (which includes Libertarian and Tea Party Republicans) will NEVER agree on ANYTHING, especially not this.

    The primary purpose of this HC Bill was a big tax cut for the wealthy disguised as a HC Bill. The secondary purpose was to get rid of anything having to do with Obama, even if it means breaking all parts that don't need fixing.

    Trump made a several mistakes, here:

    (a) He didn't read the fucking Bill. Insiders said he asked "is this a good Bill?" Because he hadn't read it. Then he got behind it, seemingly unaware of the BIG DIVIDE between the Moderate and Conservative Republicans.

    (b) He and Ryan pushed this through too fast. It took nearly TWO YEARS for the ACA to pass. But, the ACA passed with 100% Democrat vote and 0 Republican votes. The Dems weren't split like these Republicans.

    (c) Trump ran as a non-Party populist. The minute he got into office, he became controlled by the SUPER Conservative Right, forgetting those voters (NOT overly right-wing Conservative) who got him into office; the ones who wanted him to make deals, "get things done," and fuck the Establishment. But then Trump got into bed with the Republican Right-Wing Establishment.

    (d) The rift between the Tea Party and Moderate Republicans is so wide, it's a big big problem. They will NEVER agree on certain issues. EVER. The End

    (e) Priebus is now indicating that the way they will "get this done" is the bring together the Democrats and the Moderate Republicans. Yup, that's the only way anything will get done. The ACA has some flaws that need fixing. Realistic Dems admit this is true. Whining about it, like Chuck Schumer yesterday on Sunday News programs, isn't going to help anybody. Fix the fucking thing. Figure out a way for Dems and Moderate Republicans to work together.
    Last edited by allegro; Yesterday at 01:01 PM.

  9. #1989
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    419
    Mentioned
    17 Post(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by allegro View Post
    Except the failure of this newest HC Bill isn't Trump's failure: It's the fractured Republican party's failure. (And, yes, it's that fucking pompous Paul Ryan's failure.)

    The Moderate Republicans and the EXTREME Conservative Republicans (which includes Libertarian and Tea Party Republicans) will NEVER agree on ANYTHING, especially not this.

    The primary purpose of this HC Bill was a big tax cut for the wealthy disguised as a HC Bill. The secondary purpose was to get rid of anything having to do with Obama, even if it means breaking all parts that don't need fixing.

    Trump made a several mistakes, here:

    (a) He didn't read the fucking Bill. Insiders said he asked "is this a good Bill?" Because he hadn't read it. Then he got behind it, seemingly unaware of the BIG DIVIDE between the Moderate and Conservative Republicans.

    (b) He and Ryan pushed this through too fast. It took nearly TWO YEARS for the ACA to pass. But, the ACA passed with 100% Democrat vote and 0 Republican votes. The Dems weren't split like these Republicans.

    (c) Trump ran as a non-Party populist. The minute he got into office, he became controlled by the SUPER Conservative Right, forgetting those voters (NOT overly right-wing Conservative) who got him into office; the ones who wanted him to make deals, "get things done," and fuck the Establishment. But then Trump got into bed with the Republican Right-Wing Establishment.

    (d) The rift between the Tea Party and Moderate Republicans is so wide, it's a big big problem. They will NEVER agree on certain issues. EVER. The End

    (e) Priebus is now indicating that the way they will "get this done" is the bring together the Democrats and the Moderate Republicans. Yup, that's the only way anything will get done. The ACA has some flaws that need fixing. Realistic Dems admit this is true. Whining about it, like Chuck Schumer yesterday on Sunday News programs, isn't going to help anybody. Fix the fucking thing. Figure out a way for Dems and Moderate Republicans to work together.
    I feel that we're living in the age of myth's the myth of American exceptionalism the myth of Regan it makes no sense look around at 90% of the other civilized world and go hey how about we do something like that? god forbid we become to European when we have a puppet of the Kremlin in the white-house,political parties as sports teams or elections as some "alt" American idol as was said in the Bowery boy's "wise-up" schools out idiot
    -Louie

  10. #1990
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    chilltown
    Posts
    1,419
    Mentioned
    17 Post(s)
    Who are these mythical moderate Republicans? You can count them on one hand in the Senate, and maybe two hands in the House.

  11. #1991
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    419
    Mentioned
    17 Post(s)
    there in hiding with the tax and spend democrats liberal media school indoctrination compassionate conservatism and various other bull shit you've been force fed
    -Louie

  12. #1992
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    140
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by bobbie solo View Post
    Who are these mythical moderate Republicans? You can count them on one hand in the Senate, and maybe two hands in the House.
    We have plenty of mythical "moderate" Dems who'll largely bend over and take it from conservatives to appeal to a conservative voter base, that's for sure.

  13. #1993
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    8,390
    Mentioned
    675 Post(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by bobbie solo View Post
    Who are these mythical moderate Republicans? You can count them on one hand in the Senate, and maybe two hands in the House.
    See Tuesday Group which killed this new HC Bill (along with the Conservative "Freedom Caucus"). See also Main Street Partnership.

    Tuesday Group statement:

    "After careful deliberation, I cannot support the bill and will oppose it. I believe this bill, in its current form, will lead to the loss of coverage and make insurance unaffordable for too many Americans, particularly for low-to-moderate income and older individuals," the group's leader Rep. Charlie Dent (R-PA)
    Illinois Governor Bruce Rauner is a Moderate Republican. (I voted for him.)
    Last edited by allegro; Yesterday at 03:42 PM.

  14. #1994
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    419
    Mentioned
    17 Post(s)
    the Freedom Caucus" is a bunch of good "ole' boy's whose book of the month is "the handmaids tale" every month who are so far right thy make Jerry Falwell look like a gay pot smoking war protesting hippy, and whiter than a polar bear eating a saltine cracker covered with vanilla ice-cream in a snowstorm underneath highway construction floodlights watching re-runs of friends on fox
    -Louie

  15. #1995
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    8,390
    Mentioned
    675 Post(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Louie_Cypher View Post
    the Freedom Caucus" is a bunch of good "ole' boy's whose book of the month is "the handmaids tale" every month who are so far right thy make Jerry Falwell look like a gay pot smoking war protesting hippy, and whiter than a polar bear eating a saltine cracker covered with vanilla ice-cream in a snowstorm underneath highway construction floodlights watching re-runs of friends on fox
    -Louie
    I don't think they are the Religious Right; they're REALLY into LIMITED Government and "fiscal responsibility." It includes some Tea Party members. It's a really small but RIDICULOUSLY POWERFUL group.

    Most media reports refer to the Freedom Caucus as a group of hard-line conservatives. While they are certainly conservative, ideology is not what makes the Freedom Caucus special. The group is distinctive because of its members’ willingness to risk their offices, political relationships, and even the basic functioning of the federal government to stay true to their values.

    The core leaders of the group describe themselves as principled constitutionalists who refuse to be corrupted by Washington. They see themselves as “Mr. Smith Goes to Washington” politicians, principled lawmakers who refuse to play the corrupt game of politics.
    Last edited by allegro; Yesterday at 06:27 PM.

  16. #1996
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    419
    Mentioned
    17 Post(s)
    not corrupt? correct me if I'm wrong but I believe they are part of the Koch brothers super PAC let's just be honest and have some truthfulness and call them by their real name the asshole caucus
    -Louie

  17. #1997
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    8,390
    Mentioned
    675 Post(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Louie_Cypher View Post
    not corrupt? correct me if I'm wrong but I believe they are part of the Koch brothers super PAC let's just be honest and have some truthfulness and call them by their real name the asshole caucus
    -Louie
    I do not subscribe to the group-think the Koch brothers are the evil assholes that the Liberals portray them to be.

    The Koch brothers are socially liberal, and fiscally conservative. Which, in my opinion, is still better than being socially conservative and financially conservative. The Koch brothers are Libertarians. They're pretty smart, thoughtful guys. They don't have a religious agenda. They nearly SOLELY push for a small Federal government and responsible spending.

    Here's an interesting interview with Charles Koch.

    The Koch brothers loudly opposed the new HC bill but they didn't fund the Freedom Caucus to defeat it.
    Last edited by allegro; Yesterday at 07:39 PM.

  18. #1998
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    419
    Mentioned
    17 Post(s)
    i agree with the above post and will happily admit if I am wrong or misrepresent i could not find any info that the Koch's funded the freedom caucus the best reliable info I found was here http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank...nd-whos-in-it/ but no money mentioned
    -Louie

  19. #1999
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    4,640
    Mentioned
    270 Post(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by theimage13 View Post
    No matter how many times the man has failed, and no matter how many articles like this I've read, I still don't personally know a single person who voted for him who has since expressed even the tiniest bit of regret or frustration at the administration thus far.
    I do... I have some relatives who were on the "anyone but Hillary" train, and they regret it. I've had a hard time resisting the urge to say "I told you so."

  20. #2000
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Indiana
    Posts
    4,267
    Mentioned
    23 Post(s)
    I feel like the massive regret will come once he's been in for awhile and we're used to him. Familiarity breeds contempt after all.

  21. #2001
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    4,640
    Mentioned
    270 Post(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by onthewall2983 View Post
    I feel like the massive regret will come once he's been in for awhile and we're used to him. Familiarity breeds contempt after all.
    the reason a lot of people will never admit they're wrong applies here: stubborn pride. It's a common personality trait with narcissists, and it's no secret who the narcissists favored in the last election: The biggest narcissist of all time. Those people fear knowing that someone else is right when they say "I told you so" more than almost anything else.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions