Active Member
Oh, didn't you already do that? It sure sounded that way when you implied that they did poorly because they didn't have the Nine Inch Nails name attached to them.Originally Posted by Krazy
Maybe you could have said that at the beginning instead of bringing up all this other nonsense. Just a thought.I decided to leave Ghosts off since I’m not sure how to rank it- that’s it!
Dis-member
According to Wikipedia Welcome Obligion peaked at #30 on the US charts, which is fair to say that it didn’t do as well as Hesitation Marks.Oh, didn't you already do that? It sure sounded that way when you implied that they did poorly because they didn't have the Nine Inch Nails name attached to them.
Maybe you could have said that at the beginning instead of bringing up all this other nonsense. Just a thought.
There’s your fucking answer.
Active Member
#30 isn't bad when you consider how much music comes out in a year and the variety of music that factors into those chart listings. Also, why did it have to do as well or better than Hesitation Marks to be considered a success? Of course a Nine Inch Nails album is going to sell more, but that doesn't prove that Welcome Oblivion was a total flop. Like I said, it was never going to be a record-breaking chart-topper. Try again.
And this still doesn't prove that Ghosts isn't a true Nine Inch Nails album.
Reply With Quote
