Last edited by allegro; 05-06-2018 at 03:22 PM.
Yeah, I know someone who saw him in 1990 and said he forgot some of the words. I have some shows from the late 80's and he still sounds pretty great. He was probably more hit-or-miss in his last few years of touring. I did rather enjoy his Duets albums from the early/mid 90's.
Even THAT was pretty heavily-processed, ham-fisted Phil Ramone production, and he was never in the room with the other people doing the duets.
I'm just saying that holding out Sinatra as an example of creativity in a Billy Corgan thread isn't really all that genuine; Sinatra contributed his own sense of timing and phrasing, but he never wrote a song, never wrote lyrics, and he was always very careful to credit all of people who did, including the arrangers and conductors and orchestras and all of those who made him look good.
Sinatra was more of an actor, taking a play and a script and giving it his own performance.
But he wasn't writing the plays. And he was careful to point that out, always.
Last edited by allegro; 05-06-2018 at 03:23 PM.
A poster said something about artists losing something in their 30's and I pointed out that Sinatra peaked, creativity, later on, in his 40's. And of course other people assisted Frank with his music, but he was still the chairman and he was an artist. As far as Duets goes, other people have made the same criticisms and those are fair points, but I still enjoyed them.
That's the argument we are making, right there. The word "creativity." He wasn't doing anything creative. Other people were doing the creative part. Frank showed up and sang.
Rachmaninov wrote Prelude in G Minor and .
That doesn't make Evgeny Kissin "creative" in any sense of the word. It certainly makes him talented, but not creative.
We must not confuse "technique" for "creativity."
Last edited by allegro; 05-06-2018 at 03:19 PM.