Page 75 of 75 FirstFirst ... 25 65 73 74 75
Results 2,221 to 2,233 of 2233

Thread: Gun Talk - News, Laws, etc.

  1. #2221
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Canton, Ohio
    Posts
    446
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by DigitalChaos View Post
    So my never-fired weapons contribute to the perception that gun owners like to shoot shit. K lol.
    You own them out of the childish sentiment that having them pisses people off. Do you really not get how immature that is?

    The perception of the antis is irrelevant. It's been tried and they will just continually take and take. Appealing to them is a waste of time when you can make their opinions irrelevant.
    And your solution is to go out of your way to antagonize people by owning weapons you never intend to shoot? Way to contribute, dude.

  2. #2222
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    5,073
    Mentioned
    163 Post(s)

    Gun Talk - News, Laws, etc.

    "Childish" lmao. It's over your head dude. It's cool. Don't worry about it. You continue to focus on a very very small aspect of what I explained.

  3. #2223
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Canton, Ohio
    Posts
    446
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by DigitalChaos View Post
    "Childish" lmao. It's over your head dude. It's cool. Don't worry about it. You continue to focus on a very very small aspect of what I explained.
    I doubt that. Go ahead and explain it for me again. Use small words. I'm sure you're just a misunderstood social justice genius slumming it with the rest of us plebs. Lay it on me, I'm all eyes.

  4. #2224
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Vancouver, BC
    Posts
    666
    Mentioned
    29 Post(s)
    The United States is fucked. Canadians have just as many guns per capita... but our laws are different..and that could be what makes all the difference......

  5. #2225
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    New York City
    Posts
    3,591
    Mentioned
    199 Post(s)
    No they don't.

  6. #2226
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Northwest Indiana
    Posts
    1,767
    Mentioned
    75 Post(s)
    Just let @DigitalChaos have his thread and the ridiculous mentality that if big bad gov decides to come get his guns (they wonít), he would get a single shot off. Heís just going to be a condescending prick to any challenge, well thought out or otherwise, and thatís a shame because over the years I had respect for him but that dwindles with every post in this thread. Goddammit, I hate this thread. Somebody tell me to stop reading it. Itís only good for eye rolls and sadness.

    So let me be a condescending prick for a couple mean albeit logical thoughts here:

    The dumbest gunnut belief of all is that their guns will mean a fucking thing when not only do the govt have more guns and better weapons in general but can also reduce you and your house to a paste via drone.

    You want a pistol or two to protect your home from intruders? Cool. Not my thing, but I understand and respect your choice. You need a rifle to hunt? I really donít like hunting, I think itís pretty much the weakest and least impressive thing you can do but even for this lame purpose? Sure. Fine.

    Which brings us to...

    The second dumbest gunnut belief is that they need anything other than a pistol or two and/or rifle. The 2nd amendment was written when guns were musket loaded. The founding fathers didnít anticipate assclowns walking around Target with AR 15s and small penises. Nobody needs an AR-15 that isnít in the military, including police.

    Because I imagine this might be the last time I post in this thread (never say never), letís throw a ďFuck the NRA and their shitbag greedy lobbying thatís bought Congress and kept us from having many of the existing gun control laws enforced (also fuck the weak ATF) and from having any kind of sane gun control discussions.Ē

    Flame away. I said my piece.
    Last edited by Swykk; 12-01-2017 at 04:51 PM.

  7. #2227
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Vancouver, BC
    Posts
    666
    Mentioned
    29 Post(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Sarah K View Post
    No they don't.
    Wow you’re right. I guess this was some “common knowledge” thrown around in Canada thst seems to be false. Canada is 11th in the world, right under France..... but Canada is still far more peaceful...like 2/3 less gun murders...per capita

  8. #2228
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Canton, Ohio
    Posts
    446
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    This seems like it could be a big deal:

    https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/...cks/901017001/

  9. #2229
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    5,073
    Mentioned
    163 Post(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Demogorgon View Post
    This seems like it could be a big deal:

    https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/...cks/901017001/
    LMAO. I can't wait to see the repubs process this. If it happened under Obama they would freak. But under Trump I'm betting they will take a more rational "well they weren't supposed to have guns... party of law and order something something something"


    And wtf is up with NICS, it already gives a pass to anyone with a fake identity. But it's also giving passes to known-bad identities in the thousands?!?!?

  10. #2230
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Canton, Ohio
    Posts
    446
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Yeah, this situation looks to be one massive fuck up, and trying to seize all of these weapons is going to lead to more fuck ups and a lot of dangerous situations. These are people who aren't suppose to have guns in the first place because of something in their background check, so, it's rock and a hard place: let them keep the weapons knowing they may use them to do criminal acts, or move in and take them while trying not to get shot in the process. No winners here.

  11. #2231
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    5,073
    Mentioned
    163 Post(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Swykk View Post
    He’s just going to be a condescending prick to any challenge, well thought out or otherwise, and that’s a shame because over the years I had respect for him but that dwindles with every post in this thread.
    Over the years you'd see that I give equal thought as a reply provides. Nothing about what Demogorgan's replies were "well thought out." They were purposefully myopic, and thus, not worth a deep reply.

  12. #2232
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    5,073
    Mentioned
    163 Post(s)

    Gun Talk - News, Laws, etc.

    I'm not the most articulate, so if you want a better perspective about what I was putting down, check this documentary that came out this week:

    http://www.imdb.com/title/tt6333062/

    The doc goes beyond just guns. I have put significant portions of my last several years into the efforts you see on display here.


    e: it's on iTunes, Hulu, etc.
    Last edited by DigitalChaos; 12-08-2017 at 01:11 PM.

  13. #2233
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Canton, Ohio
    Posts
    446
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by DigitalChaos View Post
    Over the years you'd see that I give equal thought as a reply provides. Nothing about what Demogorgan's replies were "well thought out." They were purposefully myopic, and thus, not worth a deep reply.
    1) You apparently don't know what "myopic" means.
    2) My thoughts were direct observations of something you yourself said, chiefly that you own guns for the political clout it gives you in arguments rather than for any reasonable desire or need to own them. You've never even fired a shot, again by your own admission, and someone who actually understands and respects firearms on any level will make a point to go to a range and at least know how they operate and what they're capable of.
    3) You didn't give a deep reply because your initial reasoning was exactly what I said it was and there isn't anything deeper to it. Someone on the previous thread asked you to clarify before I chimed in, and you essentially repeated yourself with different words. Despite my sarcasm, I still gave you a third opportunity to go in depth about your thoughts, and you've declined using the age old teenage trope "nah, you just don't understand". You aren't a radical of any stripe; you're irresponsible, self-absorbed, and terribly misinformed.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions