I doubt they'll include it, but they should include the pilot version.
Also, I don't like that artwork AT ALL. It looks so cheaply done.
I doubt they'll include it, but they should include the pilot version.
Also, I don't like that artwork AT ALL. It looks so cheaply done.
I wish Lynch's films weren't so expensive or hard to get on blu-ray.
I love how much criterion hates my wallet full...
I got goosebumps watching this trailer.
Hey, I just want Lynch to take his time and get it right. I'm excited for this. I still have 20 episodes to go for the entire series and then do Fire Walk with Me.
In the Blue Velvet deleted scenes, did anyone else notice that during the scenes where Jeffrey receives a call from his mother telling him he needs to come home, that the music in the background is actually a modern day David Lynch track?
Last edited by henryeatscereal; 11-04-2015 at 04:54 PM.
I wonder how they're going to do it. My guess is the first nine in 2017. Then, maybe the other nine the following year. I can't see them doing all 18 at once.
That's not a bad news at all.
I can wait till 2017. Besides, it will give Lynch more time to visualize and write everything till he gets it right.
hahahahahahahahaha
Fans of the movie may recall the minor controversy about "censorship" that erupted when it was first released on DVD. During her nude scene at the 99-minute mark, Laura Harring's crotch area was digitally obscured to block out her pubic region. (This carried through to the Studio Canal Blu-rays as well.) However, the scene in question was already cloaked in heavy shadows, and the effect was not visible at normal playback calibration levels. It only became an issue when certain horny viewers freeze-framed on the shot and cranked up their TVs' Brightness settings to ridiculous solar-flare levels.
In the interest of thoroughness, I made a point to check this. In what will no doubt be a great relief to perverts everywhere, the optical blurring has been removed from the new video transfer. To their inevitable dismay, they will be greatly disheartened to discover that the shot is so oppressively dark that it's not possible to see anything between the actress' legs anyway. It turns out that the blurring was never needed in the first place, and this remains a non-issue under normal viewing conditions.
You're right as long as it's getting made got no complaints, i just wanted to see the new season so bad.
I agree with @Piko probably it will be the first episodes in 2017 and the conclusion in 2018.
http://blogs.indiewire.com/theplayli...lease-20151104
Agent Rosenfeld is coming back. Oh shit.... more fights between him and Truman.
http://caps-a-holic.com/c.php?go=1&d...&i=7#vergleich
Apparently Mulholland Drive isn't the only release that has had compression issues. On the last several of their releases, there have been issues, and anytime anyone brings it up on their forums, they get harassed by Criterion fanatics. My Own Private Idaho is said to be the worst.
As long as nobody else fucking dies......
I just finished the first of a four-part series that I'm doing about David Lynch as I'm not sure when it's going to come out for the blog I'm writing for but this is the biggest profile of a filmmaker that I've done since Woody Allen. Part 1 covers his early shorts to The Elephant Man, the second part revolves around Dune to Twin Peaks: Fire Walk with Me, the third part covers On the Air to Mulholland Dr. and the fourth part will cover the shorts he did from 2002 to the upcoming revival of Twin Peaks as I posted my review of Dune: http://thevoid99.blogspot.com/2015/1...1984-film.html
Twin Peaks always kind of lived in a time void, sure it aired in '90, but it never showed much in the way of technology. With the lengthy time passage being established in the original run ("I'll see you again in 25 years") I wonder what life is going to be like in the new Twin Peaks. Can you imagine everyone walking around with smart phones? Side thought, wasn't Mark Frost writing a book that was supposed to explain the stories of what happened to all of the characters during the last 25 years... any news on that?
Mine was this exchange:
[21st century shithole irony]
It's an ironic encode. You guys just don't get it, Criterion is three steps ahead as always.
[Jerry Dandridge]
@21st century shithole irony: Criterion isn't always three steps ahead.
[21st century tonal grasp]
Not a serious remark, Jerry.
And, of course, this:
Indeed, Lynch has talked about this extensively in the vagina lotus afterbirth sessions; how he wanted to capture, in 2001, the feel of a movie being streamed via subpar internet connection and mpeg4 encoder in summer of 2009 via the initial disc-dependant PS3 iteration of Netflix streaming, like "A complete loser, lost to the world".
^
Blue Velvet is easily my number one. Eraserhead being a very close second. I tried getting into Lost Highway, but I was completely thrown off by it. Have yet to see Inland Empire.
Funny that "Inland Empire" it's the only Lynch movie i can't stand, but i want to watch it again because it's been so many years...
I'm gonna have to pick up Inland Empire. Lost Highway was all over the place, imo. That, or I didn't get it. Wild at Heart is pretty underrated, imo.